中国科技期刊研究 ›› 2023, Vol. 34 ›› Issue (9): 1127-1137. doi: 10.11946/cjstp.202303120156

• 论坛 • 上一篇    下一篇

基于内容分析的世界一流大学期刊预警制度探析

王佳豪()(), 章婧, 杨浩华, 陈铭*()()   

  1. 南京大学信息管理学院,江苏省南京市栖霞区仙林大道163号 210046
  • 收稿日期:2023-03-12 修回日期:2023-07-08 出版日期:2023-09-15 发布日期:2023-10-07
  • 通讯作者: *陈 铭(ORCID:0000-0001-5061-6821),博士,副教授,硕士生导师,E-mail:chenming@nju.edu.cn。
  • 作者简介:

    王佳豪(ORCID:0000-0002-7279-8846),硕士研究生,E-mail:;

    章 婧,硕士研究生;

    杨浩华,硕士研究生。

  • 基金资助:
    江苏高校哲学社会科学研究重大项目“开放环境下学术期刊的信誉风险预警研究”(2022SJZD093)

Analysis of journal early-warning system of world-class universities based on content analysis

WANG Jiahao()(), ZHANG Jing, YANG Haohua, CHEN Ming()()   

  1. School of Information Management, Nanjing University, 163 Xianlin Avenue, Qixia District, Nanjing 210046, China
  • Received:2023-03-12 Revised:2023-07-08 Online:2023-09-15 Published:2023-10-07

摘要:

目的】为应对日益严峻的掠夺性出版问题,借鉴世界一流大学期刊预警实践经验,为改进我国学术期刊预警制度现状并推动科研诚信体系建设提供参考。 【方法】通过网络调研,获取2022年QS世界大学排名前50的高校网站中关于期刊预警主题的文本资料,借助扎根理论对其进行内容分析。【结果】构建世界一流大学期刊预警制度要素模型,发现我国期刊预警制度处于起步阶段,在期刊检查工具、出版政策、学科服务等方面存在不足。【结论】需通过推广学术期刊检查工具、引导作者关注出版权益、强化科研经费审核与管理、建设期刊预警主题学科服务平台、改进科研评价方式等手段进一步完善期刊预警制度。

关键词: 预警期刊, 内容分析, 开放获取, 掠夺性期刊

Abstract:

[Purposes] In order to deal with the increasingly severe problem of predatory publishing, it is necessary to learn from the practice experience of journal early-warning of world-class universities and provide a reference for improving the current situation of the early-warning system of academic journals in China and promoting the construction of scientific research credit system. [Methods] By online research, text data on the subject of journal early-warning were obtained from the websites of the top 50 universities in the 2022 QS World University Ranking, and the content analysis of relevant data was carried out based on grounded theory. [Findings] We construct the element model of the journal early-warning system in world-class universities and find that the journal early-warning system in China is in the initial stage. There are shortcomings in the journal inspection tools, publishing policies, and disciplinary services. [Conclusions] It is necessary to further improve the journal early-warning system by promoting the inspection tools of academic journals, guiding authors to pay attention to publishing rights, strengthening the review and management of scientific research funds, building the subject service platform of journal early-warning, and improving the research evaluation methods.

Key words: Early-warning journal, Content analysis, Open access, Predatory journal