中国科技期刊研究 ›› 2023, Vol. 34 ›› Issue (9): 1111-1118. doi: 10.11946/cjstp.202304090259

• 论坛 • 上一篇    下一篇

资本失范性介入国际学术期刊的出版乱象分析与治理思考

武大伟1,2)()(), 徐飞1),*()()   

  1. 1) 中国科学技术大学科技哲学系,安徽省合肥市包河区徽州大道1129号 230051
    2) 西南科技大学马克思主义学院,四川省绵阳市涪城区青龙大道59号 621010
  • 收稿日期:2023-04-09 修回日期:2023-07-13 出版日期:2023-09-15 发布日期:2023-10-07
  • 通讯作者: *徐 飞(ORCID:0000-0003-0789-3537),博士,教授,博士生导师,E-mail:xufei@ustc.edu.cn。
  • 作者简介:

    武大伟(ORCID:0000-0003-4694-603X),博士研究生,讲师,E-mail:

  • 基金资助:
    国家社会科学基金“强化现代化建设科技人才支撑的实现路径与对策研究”(23AZD040); 中国科大新文科基金“突破传统评价机制培育一流青年科技人才的体制机制创新研究”(FSSF-S-220201)

Analysis and governance thinking on the publishing chaos of international academic journals involved in capital misconduct intervention

WU Dawei1,2)()(), XU Fei1)()()   

  1. 1) Department of Philosophy of Science and Technology, University of Science and Technology of China, 1129 Huizhou Avenue, Baohe District, Hefei 230051, China
    2) College of Marxism, Southwest University of Science and Technology, 59 Qinglong Avenue, Fucheng District, Mianyang 621010, China
  • Received:2023-04-09 Revised:2023-07-13 Online:2023-09-15 Published:2023-10-07

摘要:

目的】 通过对资本失范性介入国际学术期刊出版乱象的分析,为开放获取模式下我国学术期刊出版规范管理和伦理治理提供研究参考。【方法】 结合Cabells掠夺性期刊报告和国际科学院组织掠夺性期刊案例数据,从资本失范性介入的视角,揭示当前国际学术期刊出版领域乱象丛生的原因及伦理问题。【结果】 被资本失范性介入的国际学术期刊存在虚假同行评议、克隆知名期刊、戏弄学术研究、精准定向收割、绑架投稿索酬等出版乱象。从资本失范性介入的视角观察,存在伦理失范加剧、学术规范异化、定向掠夺资源、学术价值扭曲等伦理问题。【结论】 厘清问题本质,着重源头治理,从认知层面全面提升科研人员对学术出版领域学术失范的辨识能力,营造正确的学术价值观,以科研诚信的自觉主动抵制失范逐利的诱惑。

关键词: 资本失范性介入, 出版乱象, 伦理治理, 掠夺性期刊

Abstract:

[Purposes] Through the analysis of capital misconduct intervention in the publishing chaos of international academic journals, this paper provides a research reference for the standardized management and ethical governance of academic journal publishing in China under the open access model. [Methods] According to Cabells' predatory journal report and Inter-Academy Partnership predatory journal case data, from the perspective of capital misconduct intervention, the paper revealed the reasons and ethical issues of the current chaos in the international academic journal publishing field. [Findings] International academic journals that have been intervened by capital misconduct exhibit publishing chaos such as false peer reviews, cloning of well-known journals, teasing academic research, precisely targeted harvesting, and kidnapping submissions for compensation. From the perspective of capital misconduct intervention, there are ethical issues such as intensified ethical misconduct, differentiation of academic norms, targeted resource plundering, and distortion of academic values. [Conclusions] We should clarify the essence of the problem, focus on source governance, comprehensively improve the cognitive ability of researchers to identify academic misconduct in the field of academic publishing, create correct academic values, and actively resist the temptation of misconduct and profit with scientific integrity.

Key words: Capital misconduct intervention, Publishing chaos, Ethical governance, Predatory journal