摘要：

目的 建立开放科学环境下的“论文学术交流效能评价框架”，以及系统测度预印本对OA期刊论文学术交流效能的提升，有助于促进预印本与OA期刊协同发展，优化开放科学生态实践。 方法 以“学术交流”的内涵与目标为底层逻辑构建“论文学术交流效能评价指标体系”，以综合应用倾向得分匹配与分位数回归分析作为量化学术交流效能提升效应的方法，从时间动态、期刊影响力、论文主题3个方面设置分组分析，形成“论文学术交流效能评价框架”，系统测度预印本对OA期刊论文学术交流效能的提升。 结果 在学术交流效率、学术交流强度和学术交流广度3个维度，预印本均显著提升了OA期刊论文的学术交流效能，并获得了5个关键分位点和3个分组的量化结果。 结论 预印本与OA期刊协同发展形成系统效应，共同促进开放科学生态的形成与演进；预印本自存档可以在一定程度上缓解学术成果交流中的马太效应，为引文增长较缓、学科和国家扩散广度有限，以及在非顶级期刊中发表的优秀论文或具有潜在交流价值的论文增强、扩大其交流效能，同时有利于激励科技期刊群的良性发展；“论文学术交流效能评价框架”为开放科学环境下OA期刊论文学术交流效能的系统评价与测度提供了可参考的框架与方法。

关键词: 预印本, OA期刊, 学术交流效能, 学术交流效率, 学术交流强度, 学术交流广度

Abstract:

Purposes The establishment of an “Academic Communication Efficacy Evaluation Framework” in an open science environment， together with the systematic measurement of the enhancing effect of preprints on the academic communication efficacy of OA journal articles， helps promote the coordinated development of preprints and OA journals，and contributes to the optimization of open science ecosystem practices. Methods Guided by the underlying logic of the connotation and objectives of “academic communication”， an “Academic Communication Efficacy Evaluation Index System” was constructed， and by comprehensively applying propensity score matching and quantile regression analysis as methods to quantify the enhancement effect on academic communication efficacy， subgroup analyses were conducted from three aspects： temporal dynamics， journal influence， and paper topics. This process led to the formation of the “Academic Communication Efficacy Evaluation Framework”， which systematically measures the enhancement effect of preprints on the academic communication efficacy of OA journal articles. Findings Across the three dimensions of academic communication efficiency， intensity， and breadth， preprints have significantly enhanced the academic communication efficacy of OA journal articles. This enhancement is substantiated by quantitative results obtained at five key quantile points and across three distinct analytical groupings. Conclusions This confirms that preprint self-archiving and OA journals develop synergistically to form a systemic effect， jointly promoting the formation and evolution of the open science ecosystem. Preprint self-archiving can， to some extent， alleviate the Matthew effect in the dissemination of academic achievements， thereby enhancing and expanding the communication efficacy of articles with slower citation growth， limited disciplinary and national diffusion breadth， or those published in non-top-tier journals yet possessing high potential communication value， also encouraging the sound development of clusters of scientific and technological journals. The “Academic Communication Efficacy Evaluation Framework” provides a referential framework and methodology for the systematic evaluation and measurement of the academic communication efficacy of OA journal articles in an open science environment.

Key words: Preprint, OA journals, Academic communication efficacy, Efficiency of academic exchange, Intensity of academic exchange, Breadth of academic exchange