中国科技期刊研究 ›› 2025, Vol. 36 ›› Issue (7): 861-868. doi: 10.11946/cjstp.202503280292

• 论坛 • 上一篇    下一篇

开放科学环境下学术出版模式变革与应对思考

雷雪()(), 姚长青, 赵伟, 潘云涛*()()   

  1. 中国科学技术信息研究所,北京市海淀区复兴路15号 100038
  • 收稿日期:2025-03-28 修回日期:2025-05-27 出版日期:2025-07-25 发布日期:2025-07-31
  • 通讯作者: * 潘云涛(ORCID:0000-0002-9930-9416),硕士,研究员,E-mail:
  • 作者简介:

    雷 雪(ORCID:0000-0001-7955-5137),博士,研究员,E-mail:;

    姚长青,博士,研究员;

    赵 伟,博士,研究员。

    作者贡献声明: 雷 雪:撰写及修改论文; 姚长青:设计研究方案; 赵 伟:修改论文; 潘云涛:提出研究方向,修改及审定论文。
  • 基金资助:
    国家社会科学基金一般项目“开放科学视域下科技期刊论文数据汇交模式研究”(22BTQ107)

Transformation and response strategies of academic publishing models in the open science environment

LEI Xue()(), YAO Changqing, ZHAO Wei, PAN Yuntao()()   

  1. Institute of Scientific and Technical Information of China, 15 Fuxing Road, Haidian District, Beijing 100038,China
  • Received:2025-03-28 Revised:2025-05-27 Online:2025-07-25 Published:2025-07-31

摘要:

【目的】解析国际学术出版在开放科学环境下的新趋势和新变革,为我国学术出版生态建设提供借鉴。【方法】通过文献调研及案例分析,从出版流程、出版内容维度分析学术出版模式的转变。【结果】在出版流程维度,传统“组稿-评审-出版”(CRP)模式向新兴“发布-评审-组稿”(PRC)模式转变;在出版内容维度,出版对象由单一要素向科研全过程转变。持久标识符体系、数据存储设施和标准规范体系等基础设施建设也同步推进。【结论】结合我国实际,提出应对变革的建议:包括重塑交流生态,让科学“回归”科学家手中;筑牢基础设施,赋能出版服务创新;引导激励创新,深化科技评价改革等。

关键词: 开放科学, 学术出版, PRC模式, 预印本, 开放同行评议

Abstract:

[Purposes] To analyze the new trends and transformations in international academic publishing under the open science environment, providing insights for the development of China’s academic publishing ecosystem. [Methods] Through literature review and case studies, the shifts in academic publishing models were examined from the dimensions of publishing processes and content. [Findings] In terms of publishing processes, the traditional “Collection-Review-Publication” model is transitioning to the emerging “Publish-Review-Curate” model. In terms of publishing content, the focus has shifted from single elements to the entire research process. Correspondingly, infrastructure such as persistent identifier systems, data storage facilities, and standardization frameworks are also being advanced. [Conclusions] Based on China’s context, recommendations for addressing these changes are proposed, including reshaping the communication ecosystem to “return” science to scientists, strengthening infrastructure to empower publishing service innovation, and guiding and incentivizing innovation to deepen reforms in scientific evaluation.

Key words: Open science, Academic publishing, PRC model, Preprints, Open peer review