中国科技期刊研究 ›› 2025, Vol. 36 ›› Issue (8): 1058-1065. doi: 10.11946/cjstp.202503200274

• 数字出版 • 上一篇    下一篇

科研数据开放政策对期刊学术影响力的提升效应——以CSCD中文期刊为例

程宇雪1)()(), 虞为1)()(), 陈俊鹏2)   

  1. 1) 南京大学信息管理学院,江苏省数据工程与知识服务重点实验室,江苏省南京市栖霞区仙林大道163号 210023
    2) 南京财经大学计算机和人工智能学院,江苏省南京市栖霞区文苑路3号 210046
  • 收稿日期:2025-03-20 修回日期:2025-06-13 出版日期:2025-08-25 发布日期:2025-09-08
  • 通讯作者: *虞 为(ORCID: 0000-0003-1933-5380),博士,副教授,E-mail: yuwei@nju.edu.cn
  • 作者简介:
    程宇雪(ORCID: 0009-0006-3066-4985),硕士研究生,E-mail:
    陈俊鹏,博士,副教授。
    作者贡献声明: 程宇雪:提出研究问题,设计研究方案,进行实验,起草论文,修订论文; 虞 为:指导研究方向,把控研究方案,监督论文质量,修订论文; 陈俊鹏:指导研究思路,指导研究方案,修订论文。
  • 基金资助:
    国家社会科学基金项目“协同共治视角下图书馆推进开放科学的服务模式研究”(21BTQ030)

Effect of open research data policies on the enhancement of journal academic influence: Taking CSCD Chinese journals as an example

CHENG Yuxue1)()(), YU Wei1)()(), CHEN Junpeng2)   

  1. 1) Key Laboratory of Data Engineering and Knowledge Service in Jiangsu Province,School of Information Management,Nanjing University,163 Xianlin Avenue,Qixia District,Nanjing 210023,China
    2) School of Computer and Artificial Intelligence,Nanjing University of Finance & Economics,3 Wenyuan Avenue,QixiaDistrict,Nanjing 210046,China
  • Received:2025-03-20 Revised:2025-06-13 Online:2025-08-25 Published:2025-09-08

摘要:

目的 从定量角度探讨期刊实施科研数据开放政策对期刊学术影响力的提升效应,从而推动期刊学术影响力不断提升并为期刊制定相关科研数据开放政策提供理论依据和决策参考。 方法 以中国科学引文数据库(CSCD)收录的中文期刊为研究对象,首先调查期刊科研数据开放政策的实施情况,随后采用双重差分法(DID)评估科研数据开放政策对期刊学术影响力的政策效应,并通过多种稳健性检验及异质性分析进一步验证结果的可靠性。 结果 科研数据开放政策的实施能够显著提升期刊的学术影响力,且政策效应在不同属性的期刊中表现出显著的异质性。 结论 期刊通过制定并执行科研数据开放政策,不仅能够提高研究论文的透明度和可靠性,还能增强期刊的学术声誉,从而扩大其学术影响力和社会影响。

关键词: 开放数据, 科学数据, 双重差分法, 学术影响力, 政策评估

Abstract:

Purposes The purpose of this paper is to explore the effect of implementing open research data policies on the enhancement of journal academic influence from a quantitative perspective, thereby promoting the continuous improvement of journal academic impact and providing a theoretical basis and decision-making reference for journals in formulating related open research data policies. Methods The study focuses on Chinese journals indexed in the Chinese Science Citation Database (CSCD). It first investigates the implementation status of open research data policies in these journals. Then, the difference-in-differences (DID) method is used to assess the policy effects of open research data on the academic influence of journals. Various robustness tests and heterogeneity analyses are conducted to further validate the reliability of the results. Findings The implementation of open research data policies significantly enhances the academic influence of journals, with policy effects showing significant heterogeneity across journals with different attributes. Conclusions By formulating and implementing open research data policies, journals can not only improve the transparency and reliability of research papers but also enhance their academic reputation, thereby expanding their academic influence and societal impact.

Key words: Open data, Scientific data, Difference-in-differences (DID) method, Academic influence, Policy evaluation