中国科技期刊研究 ›› 2025, Vol. 36 ›› Issue (7): 977-988. doi: 10.11946/cjstp.202505280555

• 评价与分析 • 上一篇    

学科交叉融合背景下高校综合学报转型发展路径——以师范院校学报为例

胡文杰1,2)()(), 朱珊莹1), 时晗娟2), 杨春明1),*()(), 王健1)   

  1. 1) 湖南师范大学期刊社,湖南省长沙市岳麓区麓山路36号 410081
    2) 湖南师范大学数学与统计学院,湖南省长沙市岳麓区麓山路36号 410081
  • 收稿日期:2025-05-28 修回日期:2025-06-20 出版日期:2025-07-25 发布日期:2025-07-31
  • 通讯作者: * 杨春明(ORCID: 0000-0001-6268-1954),博士,教授,主编/副社长,E-mail:
  • 作者简介:

    胡文杰(ORCID: 0000-0002-3316-519X),博士,副编审,编辑部主任,E-mail: ;

    朱珊莹,硕士,编辑;

    时晗娟,硕士研究生;

    王 健,硕士,副研究员。

    作者贡献声明: 胡文杰:提出研究方向、设计论文框架、撰写论文; 朱珊莹:绘制全文图表、参与数据分析与论文撰写; 时晗娟:收集数据、采集、清洗与分析数据; 杨春明:完善论文框架,修订论文; 王 健:完善论文框架,修订论文。
  • 基金资助:
    湖南省培育世界一流湘版科技期刊建设项目(2021ZL6004)

Transformation and development path of university comprehensive journals under the background of interdisciplinary integration:A case study of normal university journals

HU Wenjie1,2)()(), ZHU Shanying1), SHI Hanjuan2), YANG Chunming1)()(), WANG Jian1)   

  1. 1) Department of Periodicals, Hunan Normal University, 36 Lushan Road, Yuelu District, Changsha 410081, China
    2) School of Mathematics and Statistics, Hunan Normal University, 36 Lushan Road, Yuelu District, Changsha 410081, China
  • Received:2025-05-28 Revised:2025-06-20 Online:2025-07-25 Published:2025-07-31

摘要:

【目的】在学科交叉融合背景下,探索高校综合学报从当前学科“拼盘”模式转型发展为交叉科学期刊的理论路径;结合交叉科学栏目建设现状,实证分析高校综合性学报转型发展的可行性,为其转型提供参考。【方法】基于交叉科学的概念提出交叉科学期刊和交叉科学栏目的概念;基于交叉科学发展为交叉学科的逻辑范式,构建高校综合学报转型发展的理论模型;利用数据统计方法,以25种师范院校自然科学学报交叉科学栏目建设统计结果为例,分析高校综合学报转型发展现状。【结果】在理论分析的基础上,得到综合性学报转型发展的理论模型:从当前大杂烩的办刊模式出发,经过综合性交叉科学期刊的过渡阶段,最终转型为专业性交叉学科期刊。数据统计结果表明,近5年,19种师范学报设置了444个交叉科学栏目,其中16种共设置了158个物质科学栏目;11种共设置了22个智能科学与智造栏目;8种共设置了26个生命科学与健康栏目;17种共设置了238个融合科学栏目。重复出现的交叉科学栏目仅有42个,占比为9.46%。从学术影响力的角度看,师范院校设置的融合科学栏目篇均被引最高,达到6.69次,生命科学与健康栏目其次,为4.01次,智能科学与智造栏目最低,仅为3.38次。【结论】师范院校自然科学学报的栏目统计数据表明其具有明显的交叉特征,融合科学栏目学术影响力较高,然而栏目复现率不高。综合学报需明确办刊定位,可以依托主办单位优势交叉领域和交叉团队,面向国家战略需求合理设置交叉科学栏目,实现从“拼盘”到交叉的转型。

关键词: 学科交叉, 高校综合学报, 栏目设置, 学术影响力, 转型路径, 师范院校学报

Abstract:

[Purposes] Under the background of interdisciplinary integration, this study explores the theoretical path for transforming comprehensive university journals from the current “patchwork” model of disciplines into transdisciplinary journals. Based on the current status of cross-disciplinary science science column development, an empirical analysis is conducted to assess the feasibility of transforming comprehensive university journals, providing a reference for their transformation. [Methods] Based on the concept of cross-disciplinary science, the concepts of cross-disciplinary science journals and cross-disciplinary science columns are proposed. Using the logical framework of cross-disciplinary science development as a transition to interdisciplinary fields, a theoretical model for the transformation of comprehensive university journals is constructed. Taking the statistical results of the construction of cross-disciplinary science columns in 25 normal university journals as an example, this paper analyzes the current status of transformation and development of comprehensive university journals. [Findings] Based on theoretical analysis, a theoretical model for the transformation and development of comprehensive journals is proposed: starting from the current mixed publishing model, transitioning through a phase of comprehensive cross-disciplinary science journals, and ultimately transforming into specialized cross-disciplinary journals. The statistical data show that in recent five years, 19 normal university journals have established 444 cross-disciplinary science columns, with 16 journals setting up 158 material science columns, 11 journals setting up 22 intelligent science and intelligent manufacturing columns, 8 journals setting up 26 life science and health columns, and 17 journals setting up 238 integrated science columns. Only 42 cross-disciplinary science columns are repeatedly appearing, accounting for 9.46%. From the perspective of academic impact, the integrated science columns set by normal universities have the highest average citations per paper (6.69), followed by life science and health columns (4.01), while intelligent science and intelligent manufacturing columns have the lowest average citations per paper (3.38). [Conclusions] The column statistics of natural science journals from normal universities indicate that they exhibit significant cross-disciplinary science features, with integrated science columns showing higher academic impact. However, the recurrence rate of cross-disciplinary science columns is not high. Comprehensive journals need to clarify their publication positioning, leverage the cross-disciplinary science advantages and teams of their sponsoring institutions, and reasonably set up cross-disciplinary science science columns in line with national strategic needs to achieve a transformation from the “patchwork” model to a cross-disciplinary science one.

Key words: Interdisciplinary, University comprehensive journals, Column setting, Academic influence, Transformation path, Normal university journals