中国科技期刊研究 ›› 2024, Vol. 35 ›› Issue (10): 1461-1467. doi: 10.11946/cjstp.202406190675

• 评价与分析 • 上一篇    下一篇

学术创新与关注度、影响力的关系探究——以“中国科技期刊卓越行动计划”领军和重点期刊为例

李宁1)()(), 贾泽军2), 吴坚1,3),*()()   

  1. 1) 上海体育大学经济管理学院,上海市杨浦区清源环路650号 200438
    2) 复旦大学附属中山医院期刊中心,上海市徐汇区斜土路1609号 200032
    3) 上海体育大学期刊中心,上海市杨浦区清源环路650号 200438
  • 收稿日期:2024-06-19 修回日期:2024-08-31 出版日期:2024-10-15 发布日期:2024-11-12
  • 通讯作者: 吴坚
  • 作者简介:

    李宁(ORCID:0000-0001-5012-0324),博士研究生,E-mail:

    贾泽军,副编审,编辑部主任。

    作者贡献声明: 李 宁:设计论文框架,采集与分析数据,撰写与修订论文; 贾泽军:指导与修订论文; 吴 坚:指导论文选题,设计论文框架。
  • 基金资助:
    国家社会科学基金重点项目“新时代中国体育学术国际话语权提升研究”(20ATY007); 上海体育大学研究生自主科研创新计划项目“体育科学研究的创新价值与实证检验”(YJSCX-2024-014)

Exploring the relationship between academic novelty, attention, and impact: A case study of leading and key journals in the Excellence Action Plan for China′s STM Journals

LI Ning1)()(), JIA Zejun2), WU Jian1,3)()()   

  1. 1) School of Economics and Management, Shanghai University of Sport, 650 Qingyuan Ring Road, Yangpu District, Shanghai 200438, China
    2) Journal Publishing Center of Zhongshan Hospital Fudan University, 1609 Xietu Road, Xuhui District, Shanghai 200032, China
    3) Journal Publishing Center of Shanghai University of Sport, 650 Qingyuan Ring Road, Yangpu District, Shanghai 200438, China
  • Received:2024-06-19 Revised:2024-08-31 Online:2024-10-15 Published:2024-11-12
  • Contact: WU Jian

摘要:

【目的】

基于组合创新观点量化论文的创新价值,探究科技期刊论文学术创新与关注度、影响力的关系,为理解创新在学术传播中的作用提供数据支撑。

【方法】

以“中国科技期刊卓越行动计划”领军和重点期刊2018—2020年发表的19278篇论文为样本,采用负二项回归对学术创新与关注度、影响力的相关性进行分析。

【结果】

论文的学术创新与关注度和影响力均呈正相关(P均<0.05),且这一结果是稳健的。

【结论】

论文的学术创新不仅是提升其关注度的有效手段,更是提高其影响力的关键因素。为此建议,研判全球研究新趋势,策划跨学科专题;提升编辑学术敏锐度,精准识别创新论文;组建跨学科评审团队,确保论文评审精度。

关键词: 学术创新, 学术关注度, 学术影响力, 中国科技期刊卓越行动计划

Abstract:

[Purposes]

This study aims to quantify the novelty value of papers from the perspective of combinatorial novelty and to explore the relationship between academic novelty, attention, and impact in scientific journals. This provides data support for understanding the role of novelty in academic dissemination.

[Methods]

Using 19278 papers published in leading and key journals under the Excellence Action Plan for China's STM Journals from 2018 to 2020 as the sample, we conducted a negative binomial regression analysis to examine the correlation between academic novelty and both attention and impact.

[Findings]

The findings reveal a positive correlation between academic novelty and both attention and impact (P<0.05 in both cases), and this result is robust.

[Conclusions]

Academic novelty in papers is not only an effective means to increase attention but also a key factor in enhancing their impact. Recommendations include assessing global research trends to plan interdisciplinary special issues, enhancing editorial academic sensitivity to accurately identify innovative papers, and forming interdisciplinary review teams to ensure precise paper evaluations.

Key words: Academic novelty, Academic attention, Academic impact, Excellence Action Plan for China's STM Journals