摘要：

【目的】 对学术期刊自引率与自被引率指标进行改进和结合分析,了解新时期图情档领域期刊自引特征,为其他领域期刊自引分析提供参考。【方法】 通过比较分析,设计两年自(被)引率、两年自(被)引比等指标,结合自引率与自被引率提出期刊四分类模型(独立型、普通型、开放型、权威型);运用文献计量法对2012—2021年图情档CSSCI来源期刊进行实证分析。【结果】 2012—2021年,图情档领域发文量呈明显的下降趋势,但是自(被)引率逐年增加,两年自(被)引率相对稳定。整体上,各期刊的两年自(被)引率要高于自(被)引率,两年自(被)引比较高。图书馆学期刊自(被)引率相对较低,情报学期刊自(被)引率较高,2种档案学期刊的自(被)引率最高。通过绘制期刊自引率与自被引率坐标图,可将期刊归为四大类。【结论】 期刊两年自(被)引率、两年自(被)引比、四分类模型具有较好的实用性,能深入揭示期刊自引特征。大部分图情档领域期刊属于独立型和开放型两大类型。

关键词: 期刊自引, 自引率, 自被引率, 信息资源管理, 学术期刊评价

Abstract:

[Purposes] The self-citing rate and self-cited rate indicators of academic journals are improved and combined to understand the self-citation characteristics of journals in the field of library, information, and archives in the new era and to provide a reference for the analysis of self-citation of journals in other fields. [Methods] Firstly, the indexes such as two-year self-citing (cited) rate and two-year self-citing (cited) ratio were proposed, and a four-type classification model of journals (independent, ordinary, open, and authoritative) was developed based on the self-citing rate and self-cited rate indicators. Then, empirical analysis was conducted on the CSSCI journals in the field of library, information, and archives from 2012 to 2021. [Findings] From 2012 to 2021, the number of articles published in the field has shown a downward trend. However, the self-citing (cited) rate has been on the rise, and the two-year self-citing (cited) rate is stable. Overall, the two-year self-citing (cited) rate of each journal is higher than the self-citing (cited) rate, and two-year self-citing (cited) ratio is relatively high. Library science journals have low self-citing (cited) rates, while information science journals have high self-citing (cited) rates. The two archival science journals have the highest self-citing (cited) rates. According to coordinate map of self-citation (cited) rate, journals can be classified into four categories. [Conclusions] Two-year self-citing (cited) rate, two-year self-citing (cited) ratio, and four-type classification model well reflect the self-citation characteristics of journals, which are more practical. Most journals in the field of library, information, and archives belong to two types: independent and open.

Key words: Journal self-citation, Self-citing rate, Self-cited rate, Information resource management, Academic journal evaluation