中国科技期刊研究 ›› 2021, Vol. 32 ›› Issue (5): 687-692. doi: 10.11946/cjstp.202012060999

• 评论与分析 • 上一篇    下一篇

我国眼科学期刊自引率与自被引率的比较及演进趋势

郭佳1)(), 刘雪立2)(), 申小曼1), 申蓝1)   

  1. 1)新乡医学院管理学院,河南省新乡市金穗大道601号 453003
    2)新乡医学院期刊社/河南省科技期刊研究中心,河南省新乡市金穗大道601号 453003
  • 收稿日期:2020-12-06 修回日期:2021-03-08 出版日期:2021-05-15 发布日期:2021-05-15
  • 通讯作者: 刘雪立 E-mail:605388480@qq.com;liueditor@163.com
  • 作者简介:郭 佳(ORCID:0000-0002-8700-7269),硕士研究生,E-mail: 605388480@qq.com;|申小曼,硕士研究生;|申 蓝,硕士研究生。
  • 基金资助:
    国家社会科学基金项目“引证指标的学科标准化方法与跨学科学术评价研究”(19BTQ087);新乡医学院研究生科研创新支持计划项目(YJSCX202027Y)

Comparison and evolution trend of the self-citing rate and self-cited rate of journals of ophthalmology in China

GUO Jia1)(), LIU Xueli2)(), SHEN Xiaoman1), SHEN Lan1)   

  1. 1) Management Institute, Xinxiang Medical University, 601 Jinsui Road, Xinxiang 453003, China
    2) Periodicals Publishing House/Henan Research Center for Science and Technology Journals, Xinxiang Medical University, 601 Jinsui Road, Xinxiang 453003, China
  • Received:2020-12-06 Revised:2021-03-08 Online:2021-05-15 Published:2021-05-15
  • Contact: LIU Xueli E-mail:605388480@qq.com;liueditor@163.com

摘要:

【目的】 探讨我国眼科学期刊自引率(Rate of Self-citing;RRSC-ing)与自被引率(Rate of Self-cited;RRSC-ed)的关系及演进趋势,分析期刊自引程度,以了解我国眼科学期刊引文行为的演进趋势。【方法】 以2019年版《中国科技期刊引证报告(核心版)》收录的8种眼科学期刊为研究对象,计算2003年、2008年、2013年、2015年和2018年期刊的中文引文率、英文引文率、RRSC-ingRRSC-ed,并提出中文文献自引率(Chinese Rate of Self-citing;RcRSC-ing),通过比较中文引文率与英文引文率、RRSC-ingRcRSC-ingRRSC-ed,以获得我国眼科学期刊RRSC-ingRRSC-ed的关系及演进趋势。【结果】 英文引文率总体呈上升趋势,中文引文率总体呈下降趋势。8种眼科学期刊RRSC-ing较低且总体保持稳定,而RRSC-ed高于RRSC-ing,部分期刊RRSC-ed的演进趋势与RRSC-ing不同;RcRSC-ing高于RRSC-ed,二者演进趋势大不相同;自引量和RcRSC-ingRRSC-ed均不相关(r=0.338、r=0.321,P均>0.05),RRSC-ingRRSC-ed呈弱相关(r=0.393,P<0.05)。【结论】 水平越高、影响力越大的期刊引用的英文文献越多;自引量并不是RRSC-ed的决定性因素;个别期刊存在过度自引。

关键词: 自引率, 中文文献自引率, 自被引率, 演进趋势

Abstract:

[Purposes] We explored the correlation and evolution trend of the rate of self-citing (RRSC-ing) and rate of self-cited (RRSC-ed) of journals of ophthalmology in China, aiming at clarifying the citation trend of journals on this discipline. [Methods] We calculated the rate of Chinese references, rate of English references, RRSC-ing, and RRSC-ed of 8 ophthalmology journals in Chinese S&T Journal Citation Reports (2019) in the time-window of 2003, 2008, 2013, 2015, and 2018, proposed the Chinese rate of self-citing (RcRSC-ing), and compared the rate Chinese references with rate of English references and RRSC-ing and RcRSC-ing with RRSC-ed to conclude the correlation and development trend of RRSC-ing and RRSC-ed in ophthalmology journals in China. [Findings] The rate of English references of 8 ophthalmology journals in China showed an overall upward trend, while that of Chinese references demonstrated an opposite trend. RRSC-ing of these journals was low but stable, while RRSC-ed was higher than RRSC-ing. Moreover, the RRSC-ed trend of some journals was different from that of RRSC-ing. RcRSC-ing was higher than RRSC-ed and the trends of them were quite different. Self-citations had no correlation with RcRSC-ing or RRSC-ed (r=0.338, r=0.321; P>0.05), but RRSC-ing was correlated with RRSC-ed (r=0.393, P<0.05). [Conclusions] More English documents are cited in Chinese journals of high level and high impact. Self-citations are not among the determinants of RRSC-ed and excessive self-citation is found in some journals.

Key words: Rate of self-citing, Chinese rate of self-citing, Rate of self-cited, Evolution trend