中国科技期刊研究 ›› 2023, Vol. 34 ›› Issue (4): 502-509. doi: 10.11946/cjstp.202210050751

• 评价与分析 • 上一篇    下一篇

学术期刊自引率与自被引率指标的改进与结合分析

韩瑞珍1)()(), 吴烨2), 杨思洛2)   

  1. 1) 武汉体育学院新闻传播学院,湖北省武汉市洪山区珞喻路461号 430079
    2) 武汉大学信息管理学院,湖北省武汉市武昌区八一路299号 430072
  • 收稿日期:2022-10-05 修回日期:2023-02-22 出版日期:2023-04-15 发布日期:2023-05-22
  • 作者简介:

    韩瑞珍(ORCID:0000-0001-9471-292X),博士,副教授,E-mail:;

    吴烨,硕士研究生;

    杨思洛,博士,教授。

    作者贡献声明: 韩瑞珍:撰写论文,修改论文; 吴烨:收集数据,分析数据; 杨思洛:提出研究思路,修改论文。
  • 基金资助:
    国家社会科学基金后期资助项目“基于全文计量分析的知识交流体系研究”(22FTQB003)

Improvement and combination analysis of self-citing rate and self-cited rate indicators of academic journals

HAN Ruizhen1)()(), WU Ye2), YANG Siluo2)   

  1. 1) School of Journalism and Communication, Wuhan Sports University, 461 Luoyu Road, Hongshan District, Wuhan 430079, China
    2) School of Information Management, Wuhan University, 299 Bayi Road, Wuchang District, Wuhan 430072, China
  • Received:2022-10-05 Revised:2023-02-22 Online:2023-04-15 Published:2023-05-22

摘要:

【目的】 对学术期刊自引率与自被引率指标进行改进和结合分析,了解新时期图情档领域期刊自引特征,为其他领域期刊自引分析提供参考。【方法】 通过比较分析,设计两年自(被)引率、两年自(被)引比等指标,结合自引率与自被引率提出期刊四分类模型(独立型、普通型、开放型、权威型);运用文献计量法对2012—2021年图情档CSSCI来源期刊进行实证分析。【结果】 2012—2021年,图情档领域发文量呈明显的下降趋势,但是自(被)引率逐年增加,两年自(被)引率相对稳定。整体上,各期刊的两年自(被)引率要高于自(被)引率,两年自(被)引比较高。图书馆学期刊自(被)引率相对较低,情报学期刊自(被)引率较高,2种档案学期刊的自(被)引率最高。通过绘制期刊自引率与自被引率坐标图,可将期刊归为四大类。【结论】 期刊两年自(被)引率、两年自(被)引比、四分类模型具有较好的实用性,能深入揭示期刊自引特征。大部分图情档领域期刊属于独立型和开放型两大类型。

关键词: 期刊自引, 自引率, 自被引率, 信息资源管理, 学术期刊评价

Abstract:

[Purposes] The self-citing rate and self-cited rate indicators of academic journals are improved and combined to understand the self-citation characteristics of journals in the field of library, information, and archives in the new era and to provide a reference for the analysis of self-citation of journals in other fields. [Methods] Firstly, the indexes such as two-year self-citing (cited) rate and two-year self-citing (cited) ratio were proposed, and a four-type classification model of journals (independent, ordinary, open, and authoritative) was developed based on the self-citing rate and self-cited rate indicators. Then, empirical analysis was conducted on the CSSCI journals in the field of library, information, and archives from 2012 to 2021. [Findings] From 2012 to 2021, the number of articles published in the field has shown a downward trend. However, the self-citing (cited) rate has been on the rise, and the two-year self-citing (cited) rate is stable. Overall, the two-year self-citing (cited) rate of each journal is higher than the self-citing (cited) rate, and two-year self-citing (cited) ratio is relatively high. Library science journals have low self-citing (cited) rates, while information science journals have high self-citing (cited) rates. The two archival science journals have the highest self-citing (cited) rates. According to coordinate map of self-citation (cited) rate, journals can be classified into four categories. [Conclusions] Two-year self-citing (cited) rate, two-year self-citing (cited) ratio, and four-type classification model well reflect the self-citation characteristics of journals, which are more practical. Most journals in the field of library, information, and archives belong to two types: independent and open.

Key words: Journal self-citation, Self-citing rate, Self-cited rate, Information resource management, Academic journal evaluation