中国科技期刊研究 ›› 2023, Vol. 34 ›› Issue (8): 967-974. doi: 10.11946/cjstp.202303140166

• 论坛 • 上一篇    下一篇

有限理性视域下科技期刊论文发表不当署名行为影响因素与治理策略研究

蒙胜军1)()(), 杨庆仪1),*()(), 李艳妮1,2), 柳晨3)   

  1. 1) 西安交通大学新闻与新媒体学院,陕西省西安市咸宁西路28号 710049
    2) 国防科技大学信息通信学院,湖北省武汉市解放公园路45号 530019
    3) 西安交通大学出版社,陕西省西安市兴庆南路1号 710048
  • 收稿日期:2023-03-14 修回日期:2023-06-17 出版日期:2023-08-15 发布日期:2023-09-06
  • 通讯作者: 杨庆仪
  • 作者简介:

    蒙胜军(ORCID:0000-0001-5077-4301),博士,副教授,E-mail:;

    李艳妮,硕士研究生;

    柳晨,硕士研究生。

    作者贡献声明:
    蒙胜军:设计研究思路,指导论文撰写,修订论文;
    杨庆仪:设计论文框架,撰写、修订论文;
    李艳妮:收集、分析数据,参与论文撰写;
    柳晨:提供文献,参与论文修订。
  • 基金资助:
    陕西省社会科学基金“重大突发事件中县级融媒体对基层舆论认同的引导力提升研究”(2021M015)

Influencing factors and governance strategies of improper signing behavior in scientific journals from the perspective of bounded rationality

MENG Shengjun1)()(), YANG Qingyi1)()(), LI Yanni1,2), LIU Chen3)   

  1. 1) School of Journalism and New Media, Xi'an Jiaotong University, 28 West Xianning Road, Xi'an 710049, China
    2) College of Information and Communication, National University of Defense Technology, 45 Jiefanggongyuan Road, Wuhan 530019, China
    3) Xi'an Jiaotong University Press, 1 South Xingqing Road, Xi'an 710048, China
  • Received:2023-03-14 Revised:2023-06-17 Online:2023-08-15 Published:2023-09-06
  • Contact: YANG Qingyi

摘要:

【目的】 基于有限理性理论视角提出科技期刊论文发表不当署名影响因素理论框架,为科研诚信与学术规范建设提供参考。【方法】 通过问卷调查并借助数据统计对科技期刊论文不当署名的现实表现、成因、影响因素等进行研究。【结果】 验证基于有限理性理论视角的科技期刊论文不当署名影响因素模型,结果表明:学术素养和学术环境作为约束条件对不当署名行为具有显著影响。【结论】 国内科研诚信和学术规范建设需继续完善,建议除加强学术道德教育、改革科研评价制度、厘清学术期刊责任外,重视科技期刊发表论文署名规范的精细化和流程化,探索科技期刊应对不当署名行为的“供给侧”改革,厘清科技期刊编辑对不当署名行为的应对策略。

关键词: 科技期刊, 不当署名, 学术不端, 学术规范, 学术出版

Abstract:

[Purposes] From the perspective of bounded rationality theory, this paper puts forward a theoretical framework for the influencing factors of improper authorship in scientific journal papers, so as to provide references for the construction of scientific research integrity and academic norms. [Methods] Through questionnaire surveys and data statistics, the actual performance, causes, and influencing factors of improper authorship in scientific journals were studied. [Findings] The model of influencing factors of improper authorship in scientific journals from the perspective of bounded rationality theory is verified, and the results show that academic literacy and academic environment as constraints have a significant impact on improper authorship behavior. [Conclusions] To enhance research integrity and academic norms in China, it is suggested that in addition to strengthening academic ethics education, reforming the scientific research evaluation systems, and clarifying the responsibilities of academic journals, it is necessary to pay attention to the refinement and standardization of authorship guidelines in scientific journal publications, explore "supply-side" reforms by academic journals to address improper authorship behavior, and clarify the strategies of journal editors in dealing with such behavior.

Key words: Scientific journal, Improper authorship, Academic misconduct, Academic norm, Academic publication