中国科技期刊研究 ›› 2018, Vol. 29 ›› Issue (9): 894-900.doi: 10.11946/cjstp.201801150049

• 质量建设 • 上一篇    下一篇

基于临床科研设计的医学期刊编辑初审方法和初审单设计

吴爱华,王晴,吴婷,王姝()   

  1. 四川大学华西口腔医学院编辑部,四川省成都市人民南路三段14号 610041
  • 收稿日期:2018-01-15 修回日期:2018-06-19 出版日期:2018-09-15 发布日期:2018-09-15
  • 通讯作者: 王姝 E-mail:wangshu2414@163.com
  • 作者简介:吴爱华(ORCID:0000-0001-7624-8502),硕士,副编审,E-mail: wah_cn_evst@163.com;|王 晴,博士,编审,编辑部主任;|吴 婷,博士,副编审。

Review methods and initial evaluation form for medical journal editors based on clinical research design

WU Aihua,WANG Qing,WU Ting,WANG Shu()   

  1. Editorial Department of West China School of Stomatology, Sichuan University, 14 3rd Section, South Renmin Road, Chengdu 610041, China
  • Received:2018-01-15 Revised:2018-06-19 Online:2018-09-15 Published:2018-09-15
  • Contact: WANG Shu E-mail:wangshu2414@163.com

摘要:

【目的】 在临床科研设计基本原则和方法的基础上,提出医学期刊编辑初审的具体审稿方法,设计编辑初审单。【方法】 通过解读临床科研设计基本原则在医学科研中的重要意义,确立编辑初审思路。在初审中引入关键词检索的辅助方法,对医学论文的学术质量(包括真实性、创新性、科学性)进行评审。【结果】 医学论文的编辑初审过程就是分析临床科研设计基本原则和方法在医学科研中应用质量的过程。在此基础上设计出定性和定量评价相结合的编辑初审单,并对初审单各项目的审稿方法进行详细说明。【结论】 所提出的初审方法、设计的初审单具有较强的实用性,有助于提升医学期刊编辑的初审能力。

关键词: 编辑初审, 初审单, 临床科研设计, 检索, 医学论文, 学术质量

Abstract:

[Purposes] This study aims to introduce the detailed review methods and initial evaluation form for medical journal editors based on basic principles and methods of clinical research design. [Methods] By interpreting the basic principles and methods of clinical research design in medical science, we set up the approach to editor's initial evaluation. The method of keyword retrieval was applied in the evaluation process. By using the important assistant method, we could evaluate the academic quality (including authenticity, innovativeness, and scientificity) of medical papers and design the editor's initial evaluation form. [Finding] The process of initial evaluation for medical papers is the process of analyzing the quality and application of basic principles and methods of clinical research design. On this basis, we design the editor's initial evaluation form combining qualitative and quantitative evaluation and illustrate the detailed methods at each evaluation step. [Conclusions] The proposed initial examination methods and form are highly practical. It can contribute to improving the evaluation ability of the medical journal editors.

Key words: Initial evaluation of editor, Initial evaluation form, Clinical research design, retrieval, Medical paper, Academic quality