中国科技期刊研究 ›› 2025, Vol. 36 ›› Issue (7): 869-875. doi: 10.11946/cjstp.202502240157

• 论坛 • 上一篇    下一篇

AIGC环境下中国科技期刊知识产权保护现状分析及发展建议

丁天平1)()(), 杨海平2,3), 丁宇婷2,3)   

  1. 1) 中国科协学会服务中心,北京市海淀区学院南路86号 100081
    2) 南京大学出版研究院,江苏省南京市栖霞区仙林大道163号 210023
    3) 南京大学信息管理学院,江苏省南京市栖霞区仙林大道163号 210023
  • 收稿日期:2025-02-24 修回日期:2025-05-22 出版日期:2025-07-31 发布日期:2025-07-31
  • 作者简介:

    丁天平(ORCID:0000-0002-1518-3976),硕士,副编审,E-mail:;

    杨海平,博士,教授;

    丁宇婷,硕士研究生。

    作者贡献声明: 丁天平:提出论文基本框架,设计研究方案和研究思路,文献调研与整理,撰写论文; 杨海平:指导论文修改,审核论文; 丁宇婷:文献调研与整理,修订论文。

Analysis of the situations and development suggestions forintellectual property protection of Chinese scientific journals under the AIGC environment

DING Tianping1)()(), YANG Haiping2,3), DING Yuting2,3)   

  1. 1) Service Center for Societies of China Association for Science and Technology, 86 South Xueyuan Road, Haidian District, Beijing 100081, China
    2) Institute of Publishing Science, Nanjing University, 163 Xianlin Avenue, Qixia District, Nanjing 210023, China
    3) School of Information Management, Nanjing University, 163 Xianlin Avenue, Qixia District, Nanjing 210023, China
  • Received:2025-02-24 Revised:2025-05-22 Online:2025-07-31 Published:2025-07-31

摘要:

【目的】对人工智能生成内容(artificial intelligence generated content, AIGC)环境下科技期刊知识产权情况进行综合分析,为推动我国科技期刊知识产权保护提供参考。【方法】采用文献调研、政策文本分析的方法,对AIGC环境下中国科技期刊著作权中的复制权、改编权、翻译权、汇编权以及传播权等出现的侵权行为进行分析。【结果】传统的科技期刊知识产权保护已经变为以传播权为核心的“数字版权”保护,AIGC生成的全过程都存在侵权风险,发生侵权行为后,权利主体存在维权困难。【结论】科技期刊应当拥抱AIGC时代,构建生成式AI法律框架与科研诚信监管体系,推动建设行业技术标准联盟与动态风控机制,建立多方协同的治理架构及智能合约利益平衡机制。

关键词: 人工智能生成内容, 科技期刊, 知识产权保护, 著作权

Abstract:

[Purposes] Comprehensively analyze theintellectual property protection of scientific journals under the artificial intelligence generated content (AIGC) environment, so as to provide references for the intellectual property (IP) protection of Chinese scientific and technical journals. [Methods] This paper mainly adopts literature research method and policy text analysis method toanalyseinfringement acts involving copyrights in Chinese scientific journals under the AIGC environment, including violations of replication rights, adaptation rights, translation rights, compilation rights, and dissemination rights. [Findings] Traditional IP protection mechanisms for scientific journals have shifted towarddigital copyrightprotection centered on dissemination rights. However, AIGC's entire generation process carries infringement risks, and rights holders face difficulties in pursuing legal remedies post-infringement. [Conclusions] Scientific journals should fully leverage AIGC by establishing legal frameworks for generative AI and research integrity supervision systems, promoting industry-wide technical standard alliances and dynamic risk control mechanisms, establishing multi-party collaborative governance architectures, and implementing smart contract-based interest balancing mechanisms.

Key words: Artificial intelligence generated content (AIGC), Scientific journals, Intellectual property (IP) protection, Copyright