摘要：

目的 分析“中国科技期刊卓越行动计划”二期入选期刊的文献计量指标特点及影响期刊遴选和评估的主要因素，并探讨促进我国科技期刊高质量发展的对策和举措。 方法 基于《2024年版中国科技期刊引证报告（核心版）》（中文期刊）和《期刊引证报告》（JCR）（英文期刊）的主要计量指标数据，对入选“中国科技期刊卓越行动计划”二期的中英文期刊（领军期刊、梯队期刊）进行统计分析。同时，对比分析了一期资助但未入选二期项目期刊的相关指标变化趋势。结合项目申报与评估要求（项目规划可行性、学术影响力、办刊团队、出版运营与传播能力），进行定量与定性相结合的综合讨论。 结果 入选“中国科技期刊卓越行动计划”二期中英文期刊的总体资助率分别为35.1%和50.4%，综合评价指标、影响因子等定量指标并非期刊能否入选的决定性因素，项目规划可行性、办刊团队、出版运营与传播能力等定性因素在项目评估中也起到十分重要的作用。入选的中英文期刊均高度集中于中国科学院、中国科协、教育部3大主管单位（中文占比72.5%，英文占比78.5%）及北京、上海等科研强省（市）。 结论 “中国科技期刊卓越行动计划”二期遴选结果体现了定量指标与定性评估并重的综合导向。“中国科技期刊卓越行动计划”的遴选理念与实践为我国建设世界一流科技期刊提供了重要启示。未来科技期刊高质量发展需要重视并加强倡导学者办刊、发挥学术引领作用、出版规模与学术质量并重、提升编辑出版服务能力、加强可持续发展和平台建设等方面。

关键词: “中国科技期刊卓越行动计划”二期项目, 领军期刊, 梯队期刊, 期刊遴选, 计量指标

Abstract:

Purposes To analyze the bibliometric characteristics of journals selected for the Phase II of “Excellence Action Plan of China’s STM Journals” （hereinafter referred to as “Excellence Action”）， explore strategies to promote the high-quality development of China’s STM journals based on these findings. Methods Based on bibliometric indicator data from the 2024 Edition of the Chinese Science and Technology Journal Citation Report （Core Edition） （Chinese journals） and the SCI Journal Citation Report （JCR） （English journals）， we conducted statistical analysis on the Chinese and English journals selected for Phase II of “Excellence Action”（including leading journals and tiered journals）. Additionally， we compared and analyzed the trends in relevant indicators for journals that received funding in the first phase but were not selected for the second phase. Combining project application and evaluation requirements （project planning feasibility， academic influence， editorial team， publishing operations， and dissemination capabilities）， we conducted a comprehensive discussion combining quantitative and qualitative analysis. Findings The overall funding rates for Chinese and English journals selected for the second phase of the “Excellence Action” were 35.1% and 50.4%， respectively. Quantitative indicators such as comprehensive evaluation metrics and impact factor were not decisive factors in determining whether a journal was selected. The selected Chinese and English journals were highly concentrated in the three major administrative units of the Chinese Academy of Sciences， the China Association for Science and Technology， and the Ministry of Education （72.5% for Chinese journals and 78.5% for English journals） as well as in research-strong provinces/cities such as Beijing and Shanghai. Conclusions The selection results of the second phase of the “Excellence Action” reflect a comprehensive orientation that balances quantitative indicators and qualitative assessments. The selection philosophy and practices of the “Excellence Action” provide important insights for China’s efforts to build world-class STM journals. Future high-quality development of scientific journals requires a focus on and strengthening of initiatives such as scholar-led journal publishing， leveraging academic leadership， balancing publication scale with academic quality， enhancing editorial and publishing service capabilities， and strengthening sustainable development and platform construction.

Key words: Phase II Projects of “Excellence Action Plan of China’s STM Journals”, Leading journals, Tiered journals, Journal selection, Metric indicator