中国科技期刊研究 ›› 2025, Vol. 36 ›› Issue (7): 942-948. doi: 10.11946/cjstp.202505070475

• 能力建设 • 上一篇    下一篇

科技期刊与学科建设协同发展的内在机理及路径探索

汤梅1,2)()(), 金延秋1), 张进1), 陈禾1)   

  1. 1) 清华大学出版社,北京市海淀区双清路30号 100084
    2) 人民教育出版社,北京市海淀区中关村南大街17号院1号楼 100081
  • 收稿日期:2025-05-07 修回日期:2025-06-11 出版日期:2025-07-31 发布日期:2025-07-31
  • 作者简介:

    汤 梅(ORCID: 0000-0001-7614-1406),博士,副编审, E-mail:;

    金延秋,硕士,副编审;

    张 进,博士,编辑;

    陈 禾,博士,编审。

    作者贡献声明: 汤 梅:设计论文框架,整理数据,撰写和修订论文; 金延秋:参与讨论,修订论文; 张 进:整理数据,修订论文; 陈 禾:审核论文框架,指导论文修改。

Intrinsic mechanism and path exploration of collaborative development between scientific journals and discipline construction

TANG Mei1,2)()(), JIN Yanqiu1), ZHANG Jin1), CHEN He1)   

  1. 1) Tsinghua University Press, 30 Shuangqing Road, Haidian District, Beijing 100084, China
    2) People’s Education Press, 1 Building, 17 Zhongguancun South Street, Haidian District, Beijing 100081, China
  • Received:2025-05-07 Revised:2025-06-11 Online:2025-07-31 Published:2025-07-31

摘要:

【目的】探讨科技期刊与学科建设协同发展机理,总结科技期刊服务学科建设的典型经验,为中国特色世界一流科技期刊建设提供参考和借鉴。【方法】采用案例分析方法,以依托清华大学相关学科创办和培育,清华大学出版社运营管理的6种中英文期刊为研究对象,深入剖析科技期刊与学科建设协同发展机理,探索科技期刊与学科建设协同发展的多维路径和实践成效。【结果】通过构建“学科-期刊-平台”协同发展模式,聚焦学科特色优化期刊定位、出版学科建设成果助推学科发展、依托学科优势创办新刊重塑学术话语权、搭建学术交流平台培养学科人才等多种路径,形成期刊引领学科方向,学科反哺期刊稿源的良性循环,期刊发展与学科建设取得显著成效。【结论】科技期刊通过多维路径深度融入学科建设,实现了学术引领、人才培育、品牌影响力与国际竞争力提升的综合目标,加快了跻身世界一流期刊的步伐。科技期刊与学科建设协同发展对实现高水平科技自立自强具有重要意义。

关键词: 科技期刊, 学科建设, 协同发展, “双一流”学科

Abstract:

[Purposes] To explore the collaborative development model between scientific journals and discipline construction, summarize the typical experience of scientific journals serving discipline construction, and provide reference and inspiration for the construction of world-class scientific journals with Chinese characteristics. [Methods] Using case analysis method, this study focuses on the cultivation, establishment and development of six Chinese and English journals operated by Tsinghua University Press based on relevant disciplines of Tsinghua University. This study deeply analyzes the mechanism of collaborative development between scientific journals and discipline construction, and elucidates the multidimensional path and practical effects of collaborative development between scientific journals and discipline construction. [Findings] By constructing a collaborative development model of “discipline-journal-platform”, focusing on optimizing journal positioning based on disciplinary characteristics, publishing disciplinary construction achievements to promote disciplinary development, relying on disciplinary advantages to establish new journals to reshape academic discourse power, building academic exchange platforms to cultivate disciplinary talents, and other paths, a virtuous cycle of journals leading disciplinary directions and disciplines feeding back journal manuscript sources has been formed, and significant results have been achieved in journal construction and disciplinary development. [Conclusions] Scientific journals have deeply integrated into disciplinary construction through multidimensional paths, achieving comprehensive goals of academic leadership, talent cultivation, brand influence, and international competitiveness enhancement, accelerating the pace of becoming world-class journals. The coordinated development of scientific journals and disciplinary construction is of great significance for achieving high-level technological self-reliance and self-improvement.

Key words: Scientific journals, Discipline construction, Collaborative development, “Double First Class” discipline