摘要：

目的 通过对2015—2024年我国学术期刊评价研究现状的梳理，探讨当前我国学术期刊评价研究的焦点内容、发展现状以及存在的问题，并在此基础上提出实践发展建议，推动我国学术期刊评价工作的顺利开展。 方法 借助Citespace等量化分析工具对2015—2024年CSSCI数据库中关于期刊评价研究方面的论文进行文献计量分析，探讨期刊评价研究的现状。 结果 2015—2024年，我国期刊评价研究进入快速发展时期，研究作者和机构呈集群化发展特征，“期刊评价”“学术期刊”“影响因子”等关键词为研究的焦点。研究的核心内容主要分布在期刊评价方法研究、评价指数研究、评价体系建设以及对期刊评价工作的理性反思等方面。 结论 为了更好地推动我国学术期刊评价工作的开展，一方面，要不断完善多维度的综合性评价体系，构建分层融合、学科适配的弹性评价机制；另一方面，要构建符合中国特色并被国际社会认可的科学评价体系，积极推动我国期刊评价研究成果的落地实践，助力学术期刊高质量发展。

关键词: 期刊评价, 研究指标, 评价方法, 中国特色评价体系, CSSCI数据库

Abstract:

Purposes By reviewing the current research status of academic journal evaluation in China from 2014 to 2025， this paper explores the focus content， development status， and existing problems of academic journal evaluation research in China. Based on this， scientific and reasonable development suggestions are proposed to promote the smooth development of academic journal evaluation work in China. Methods The Citespace quantitative analysis tool was mainly used to conduct bibliometric analysis on the research papers on journal evaluation published in CSSCI core journals from 2014 to 2025， and to explore the current status of journal evaluation research. Findings The study found that research on journal evaluation in China from 2014 to 2025 has entered a period of rapid development， with authors and institutions exhibiting clustered development characteristics. Keywords such as “journal evaluation” “academic journals” and “impact factors” have become the focus of research. The core content of the research mainly focuses on the study of journal evaluation methods， evaluation index research， evaluation system construction， and rational reflection on journal evaluation work. Conclusions In order to better promote the evaluation of academic journals in China， on the one hand， it is necessary to continuously improve the multi-dimensional comprehensive evaluation system and construct a flexible evaluation mechanism that integrates layers and disciplines； On the other hand， it is necessary to establish a scientific evaluation system that is in line with Chinese characteristics and recognized by the international community， actively promote the implementation of research results in journal evaluation in China， and contribute to the high-quality development of academic journals.

Key words: Journal evaluation, Research indicators, Evaluation method, Chinese characteristics evaluation system, CSSCI database