中国科技期刊研究 ›› 2024, Vol. 35 ›› Issue (10): 1339-1348. doi: 10.11946/cjstp.202407230814

• 生成式人工智能专题 • 上一篇    下一篇

构建支持科研、面向发展、积极平衡的科技期刊AI政策

彭希珺1)()(), 华宁1), 孟美任1), 张晓林1,2),*()()   

  1. 1) 中国科学院文献情报中心,北京市海淀区中关村北四环西路33号 100190
    2) 上海科技大学,上海市浦东新区华夏中路393号 201210
  • 收稿日期:2024-07-23 修回日期:2024-09-05 出版日期:2024-10-15 发布日期:2024-11-12
  • 通讯作者: 张晓林
  • 作者简介:

    彭希珺(ORCID:0000-0001-5307-7093),硕士,副研究馆员,E-mail:

    华宁,硕士,馆员;

    孟美任,博士,副研究馆员。

    作者贡献声明: 彭希珺:参与论文框架设计,调研文献,起草论文; 华 宁,孟美任:参与科技期刊AI政策设计,修改论文; 张晓林:提出研究问题,设计论文框架,修改并审定论文。

Developing a research-empowering, future-oriented, and positively balanced AI policy for scientific journals

PENG Xijun1)()(), HUA Ning1), MENG Meiren1), ZHANG Xiaolin1,2)()()   

  1. 1) National Science Library, Chinese Academy of Sciences, 33 Beisihuan Xilu, Zhongguancun, Haidian District, Beijing 100190, China
    2) ShanghaiTech University, 393 Huaxia Middle Road, Pudong New District, Shanghai 201210, China
  • Received:2024-07-23 Revised:2024-09-05 Online:2024-10-15 Published:2024-11-12
  • Contact: ZHANG Xiaolin

摘要:

【目的】

分析AI技术对科技期刊带来的机遇与挑战,探索构建支持高质量发展的科技期刊AI政策。

【方法】

从科技期刊第一性原理出发,围绕促进科技创新、适应未来发展、促进自身高质量发展、加强科研诚信管理的要求,提出构建战略前瞻、积极平衡、分级分步、主动迭代的科技期刊AI政策框架。

【结果】

提出支持科研人员负责任应用AI工具、建立论文利用AI工具的规范化披露机制、分类管理AI工具用于论文评审、积极审慎推进AI生成内容的检测等具体的政策建议。

【结论】

提出加快建立和落实AI赋能科技期刊发展政策的建议,包括培养AI素养、发展多样化AI工具和建设支持AI赋能的公共基础设施。

关键词: 科技期刊, AI赋能, AI政策, AI使用说明, 论文评审, AI生成内容检测

Abstract:

[Purposes]

This study analyzes the opportunities and challenges that AI technology brings to scientific journals and explores the construction of an AI policy to support their high-quality development.

[Methods]

Based on the first principles of scientific journals, we proposed a forward-looking, positively balanced, step-wise, and actively iterative AI policy framework aimed at empowering research, adapting to future developments, promoting high-quality growth, and reinforcing research integrity.

[Findings]

The study suggests policy measures to support the responsible use of AI tools in research, establish normalized mechanisms for disclosing AI tool usage in research papers, implement differentiated management of AI tools in peer review, and prudently advance the detection of AI-generated content.

[Conclusions]

The study urges the establishment and implementation of policies for AI-empowered development of scientific journals, including nurturing AI literacy, developing diverse AI tools, and constructing public infrastructure to support AI empowerment.

Key words: Scientific journal, AI empowerment, AI policy, AI usage guideline, Peer review, Detection of AI-generated content