中国科技期刊研究 ›› 2024, Vol. 35 ›› Issue (8): 1066-1073. doi: 10.11946/cjstp.202401040023

• 论坛 • 上一篇    下一篇

战略科学家共同体与智库科技期刊的共演模式研究

张闳肆1,2)()(), 李诗颖3),*()()   

  1. 1) 中国工程院战略咨询中心,北京市西城区冰窖口胡同2号 100088
    2) 清华大学能源与动力工程系,北京市海淀区双清路30号 100084
    3) 四川大学公共管理学院,四川省成都市武侯区望江路29号 610065
  • 收稿日期:2024-01-04 修回日期:2024-05-17 出版日期:2024-08-15 发布日期:2024-09-10
  • 通讯作者: *李诗颖(ORCID:0000-0002-6280-9855),博士,副教授,E-mail:shiyinglipku@126.com。
  • 作者简介:
    张闳肆(ORCID:0000-0002-2755-122X),博士,助理研究员,博士后,E-mail:
    作者贡献声明: 张闳肆:提出概念,确定研究对象范围,调研与整理文献,起草论文初稿; 李诗颖:设计论文框架,收集、处理与分析质性数据,修改、审核论文。
  • 基金资助:
    四川省天府峨眉计划青年人才项目(川特聘第711号)

Coevolution model of strategic scientist community and think tank scientific journals

ZHANG Hongsi1,2)()(), LI Shiying3),*()()   

  1. 1) Center for Strategic Studies, Chinese Academy of Engineering, 2 Bingjiaokou Hutong, Xicheng District, Beijing 100088, China
    2) Department of Energy and Power Engineering, Tsinghua University, 30 Shuangqing Road, Haidian District, Beijing 100084, China
    3) School of Public Administration, Sichuan University, 29 Wangjiang Road, Wuhou District, Chengdu 610065, China
  • Received:2024-01-04 Revised:2024-05-17 Online:2024-08-15 Published:2024-09-10

摘要:

【目的】 分析战略科学家共同体与智库科技期刊的共演过程,基于生态系统共演的视角提出加强智库科技期刊建设的对策建议。【方法】 采用网络调研法、访谈法及单案例纵向研究法,对智库科技期刊与战略科学家共同体的共演过程阶段进行理论分析;根据智库科技期刊不同发展阶段的资源动态,研究智库科技期刊与战略科学家共同体在共演过程中的资源交互。【结果】 战略科学家共同体与智库科技期刊的共演是一个动态过程,在资源初建期、资源整合期和资源增益期的不同阶段相应产生资源联结与共建、资源协同与转化、资源涵养与增效等资源编排行为。【结论】 应加强对智库科技期刊的科学家资源投入与整合,发挥战略科学家共同体促进智库科技期刊发展的功能,实现智库科技期刊发展与战略科学家职业成长的双向促进。

关键词: 战略科学家, 智库, 智库科技期刊, 共演

Abstract:

[Purposes] This study investigates the coevolution of strategic scientist communities and think tank scientific journals. Drawing from the ecosystem coevolution perspective, it aims to identify strategies to boost the development of these journals. [Methods] We utilized network research, interviews, and longitudinal single-case study methods to explore the stages of coevolution between the journals and the community of strategic scientists. We also examined the exchange of resources throughout various phases of journal development to analyze the interaction of resources between both parties. [Findings] The relationship between strategic scientists and think tank scientific journals is characterized by a dynamic and staged process. The stages include the establishment, integration, and enhancement of initial resources. Resources arrangement activities observed in these stages are the linking and co-construction, synergy and transformation, and cultivation and efficiency enhancing of resources, respectively. [Conclusions] The results indicate bolstering the investment and integration of scientific resources in think tank scientific journals. The influence of the strategic scientist community should be utilized to promote the development of relevant journals. This, in turn, would contribute to both the development of relevant journals and the professional growth of the strategic scientists.

Key words: Strategic scientist, Think tank, Think tank scientific journal, Coevolution