摘要：

【目的】 为我国一流科技期刊建设中的编辑人才队伍建设提供参考。【方法】 分析学者型编辑的概念、特征、学术作用、来源等，并就学者办刊、编辑人才的发展、培养潜力及发展可行性等相关问题展开探讨。【结果】 学者型编辑以专业学术素养为最核心的素养，通过选题策划与组稿、参与审稿、参加学术会议，对提升科技期刊内容质量发挥重要作用；学者型编辑人才队伍建设有学者引进和编辑学者化两种途径。在我国主要期刊运营模式下，学者型编辑是提升期刊内容质量的重要资源；应实施编辑分类管理及评价，发挥学术编辑的学科优势而非一味鼓励其向复合型人才发展，避免非学术使用造成资源浪费，且难以实施真正意义上的学者办刊；我国科技期刊中高学历编辑占比较高，学科学者多兼职编委、主编等，这使学者型编辑队伍建设具有较大的可行性及潜力。【结论】 学者型编辑是我国世界一流科技期刊建设中人才队伍建设的重要内容，是提升科技期刊内容质量的关键主体因素。

关键词: 学者型编辑, 科技期刊, 内容质量, 编研结合

Abstract:

［Purposes］ The study aims to provide information for building the editorial talent team for developing world-class scientific journals in China. ［Methods］ We explored the concept, characteristics, academic role, and source of scholarly editors and discussed the running of journals, editorial talent development, cultivating potential, and development feasibility of scholarly editors. ［Findings］ For scholarly editors, professional academic literacy is their core literacy. Scholarly editors play an important role in improving the content quality of scientific journals through topic selection planning, solicitation, manuscript examination, attending academic conferences, etc. Scholar introduction and editor professionalization are the two main approaches to scholarly editor talent team building. Under the main models of journals running in China, scholarly editors are the main force in improving the content quality of journals. A division management and valuation for editors should be implemented, to leverage the academic capacity of academic editors rather than simply encouraging them to develop towards versatile talents. Non-academic work of academic editors should be avoided, as it causes resource waste and difficulty in realizing expert publishing. Given the high proportion of highly educated editors in scientific journals in China, and subject scholars being involved as part-time editorial board members and chief editors, the development of scholar editors is feasible with great potential. ［Conclusions］ The cultivation of scholar editors in China is an important part of the talent team building for the development of world-class scientific journals, and a key factor in improving the content quality of scientific journals.

Key words: Scholarly editor, Scientific journal, Content quality, Integration of editing and research