中国科技期刊研究 ›› 2024, Vol. 35 ›› Issue (10): 1475-1484. doi: 10.11946/cjstp.202404160373

• 评价与分析 • 上一篇    

高质量发展视域下的中国科协主管英文科技期刊发展状况调查与分析

张济明1)()(), 吴领叶2),*()(), 刘志强3), 陆祯1)   

  1. 1) 上海大学期刊社《中国运筹学会会刊(英文)》编辑部,上海市宝山区上大路99号 200444
    2) 上海大学期刊社《运筹学学报(中英文)》编辑部,上海市宝山区上大路99号 200444
    3) 上海大学期刊社,上海市宝山区上大路99号 200444
  • 收稿日期:2024-04-16 修回日期:2024-08-13 出版日期:2024-10-15 发布日期:2024-11-12
  • 通讯作者: 吴领叶
  • 作者简介:

    张济明(ORCID:0000-0002-7537-9487),硕士,副编审,编辑部主任,E-mail:

    刘志强,硕士,编审;

    陆祯,硕士,编辑。

    作者贡献声明: 张济明:确定论文选题,提出研究思路,撰写、修订论文并定稿; 吴领叶:设计框架,撰写、修订论文; 刘志强:确定论文思路,审校论文; 陆 祯:调研与整理文献。
  • 基金资助:
    上海市高校科技期刊研究基金“科技期刊集群化发展现状与路径探析——以中国科协主管期刊为例”(SHGX2024B13)

Investigation and analysis of English scientific journals indexed by SCIE under the supervision of CAST from the perspective of high quality development

ZHANG Jiming1)()(), WU Lingye2)()(), LIU Zhiqiang3), LU Zhen1)   

  1. 1) Editorial Office of Journal of the Operations Research Society of China , Periodicals Agency of Shanghai University, 99 Shangda Road, Baoshan District, Shanghai 200444, China
    2) Editorial Office of Operations Research Transactions , Periodicals Agency of Shanghai University, 99 Shangda Road, Baoshan District, Shanghai 200444, China
    3) Periodicals Agency of Shanghai University, 99 Shangda Road, Baoshan District, Shanghai 200444, China
  • Received:2024-04-16 Revised:2024-08-13 Online:2024-10-15 Published:2024-11-12
  • Contact: WU Lingye

摘要:

【目的】

全面梳理SCIE收录的中国科协主管英文科技期刊的发展状况,为其高质量发展提供建议,为管理部门制定相关政策等顶层设计提供参考,进而为促进我国科技期刊发展提供借鉴。

【方法】

采用文献计量法、网络调研法和电话调研法统计分析SCIE收录的48种中国科协主管英文科技期刊基本情况、载文量、国际作者占比、国际引用率、影响因子、总被引频次和开放获取状况等。

【结果】

SCIE收录的中国科协主管英文科技期刊在学术质量和影响力方面已取得阶段性进展,部分跻身世界一流水平,但在发展过程中也面临一些问题:主办单位归属地和学科发展领域有失均衡,自主平台建设亟须加强,部分期刊载文量偏少,国际影响力有待进一步扩大,混合期刊开放获取出版比例偏低等。

【结论】

SCIE收录的中国科协主管英文科技期刊总体发展良好,建议进一步强化政策引导,推动更多期刊高质量发展,达到世界一流水平。

关键词: 中国科协, 英文科技期刊, 开放获取, 自主出版平台, 载文量, 集群化

Abstract:

[Purposes]

This paper conducts a comprehensive review of 48 English scientific journals indexed by SCIE under the supervision of the China Association for Science and Technology (CAST). The aim is to provide suggestions for improving these journals, offer references for the journal management departments to formulate relevant policies and top-level designs, and contribute to the advancement and enhancement of Chinese scientific journals.

[Methods]

We analyzed the general status, publication volume, proportion of international authors, international citation rate, impact factors, total cites, and open access ratio of these 48 journals by bibliometric methods, network research, and telephone surveys.

[Findings]

These journals have made significant progress in terms of academic quality and influence, with some achieving world-class standards. However, they face several issues, including imbalances in hosting regions and disciplinary fields, a need for stronger domestic publishing platforms, low publication volumes for some journals, limited international influence, and a relatively low proportion of open access articles in mixed journals.

[Conclusions]

Overall, the English scientific journals supervised by CAST are developing well. It is recommended to further strengthen policy guidance to promote the high quality development of more journals, aiming to be world first-class level.

Key words: China Association for Science and Technology, English scientific journal, Open access, Domestic publishing platform, Publication volume, Journal cluster construction