中国科技期刊研究 ›› 2024, Vol. 35 ›› Issue (8): 1019-1025. doi: 10.11946/cjstp.202406270703

• • 上一篇    下一篇

2023年全球OA期刊与论文处理费监测及我国应对策略建议

芮啸1)()(), 黄金霞1,2), 王昉1),*()()   

  1. 1) 中国科学院文献情报中心,北京市海淀区中关村北四环西路33号 100190
    2) 中国科学院大学经济与管理学院信息资源管理系,北京市海淀区中关村北四环西路33号 100190
  • 收稿日期:2024-06-27 修回日期:2024-08-11 出版日期:2024-08-15 发布日期:2024-09-10
  • 通讯作者: *王昉(ORCID:0000-0002-1069-1541),硕士,副研究馆员,E-mail:wangfang@mail.las.ac.cn。
  • 作者简介:
    芮啸(ORCID:0000-0003-4042-4310),硕士,馆员,E-mail:
    黄金霞,博士,研究员。
    作者贡献声明: 芮啸:处理与分析数据,绘制图表,撰写、修订论文; 黄金霞:提出研究方向,设计论文框架,参与论文撰写、修订; 王昉:参与研究方向设计,撰写、修订论文。
  • 基金资助:
    国家社会科学基金项目“全球OA科技期刊出版大数据监测模型研究”(18BTQ059); 中国科学院文献情报能力建设专项“全球高质量开放学术论文汇聚平台”(E3290908)

Monitoring of global OA journals and article processing charges in 2023 and suggestions for China′s response strategies

RUI Xiao1)()(), HUANG Jinxia1,2), WANG Fang1),*()()   

  1. 1) National Science Library, Chinese Academy of Sciences, 33 Beisihuan Xilu, Zhongguancun, Haidian District, Beijing 100190, China
    2) Department of Information Resources Management, School of Economics and Management, University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, 33 Beisihuan Xilu, Zhongguancun, Haidian District, Beijing 100190, China
  • Received:2024-06-27 Revised:2024-08-11 Online:2024-08-15 Published:2024-09-10

摘要:

【目的】 监测全球开放获取(Open Access,OA)发展情况,研究论文处理费(Article Processing Charge,APC)合理性及科研经费流动趋势,为我国科研经费管理和高质量学术交流提供建议和参考。【方法】 基于SCIE数据和OA期刊网站信息,对全球OA期刊出版、作者发文、OA期刊APC、中国通信作者OA发文量和APC支出情况进行统计分析,并结合定量分析评估OA期刊APC合理性。【结果】 2023年全球7754种各类OA期刊被SCIE收录,收录数量较2022年下降0.1%,APC合理期刊占比为65%。全球OA发文量下降2.2%,中国通信作者OA发文量占比为29.5%。中国通信作者在5779种OA期刊上发文27.54万篇,APC支出约为52.9亿元人民币,发文量、APC支出分别较2022年增长2%、23%。国家自然科学基金是资助中国通信作者OA发文的最主要基金,年度APC支出涨幅为10%。【结论】 在全球发文量下降的背景下,中国OA发文量和APC支出仍逆势上涨。建议加强监管,确保OA出版的质量和合理性,同时优化科研经费的使用,促进高质量学术交流。

关键词: 开放科学, 开放获取期刊, 论文处理费, 监测

Abstract:

[Purposes] This paper aims to monitor the global development of open access (OA), study the rationality of article processing charge (APC), and analyze the flow of research funding to provide suggestions and references for the management of research funds and high-quality academic exchanges in China. [Methods] Based on SCIE data and OA journal website information, a statistical analysis was conducted on the publication of global OA journals, authors' publications, and APC for each OA journal, as well as the publication volume and APC expenditure of Chinese corresponding authors, combined with a quantitative analysis to evaluate the reasonableness of APC for OA journals. [Findings] In 2023, 7754 OA journals are indexed by SCIE, showing a decrease of 0.1% compared with 2022. The proportion of journals with reasonable APC is 65%. The global volume of OA publications decreases by 2.2%, and the papers published by Chinese corresponding authors account for 29.5%. Chinese corresponding authors publish 275400 papers in 5779 OA journals, with an APC expenditure of approximately 5.29 billion RMB, representing an increase of 2% and 23% in publication volume and APC expenditure, respectively, compared with those in 2022. The National Natural Science Foundation of China is the primary funder for OA publications by Chinese corresponding authors, with an annual APC expenditure increase of 10%. [Conclusions] Against the backdrop of a global decline in publication volume, China's OA publication volume and APC expenditure continue to increase. It is recommended to strengthen regulation to ensure the quality and reasonableness of OA publishing, while optimizing the use of research funding to promote the development of high-quality academic exchanges.

Key words: Open science, Open access journal, Article processing charge, Monitoring