中国科技期刊研究 ›› 2024, Vol. 35 ›› Issue (7): 1004-1010. doi: 10.11946/cjstp.202312211026

• 评价与分析 • 上一篇    下一篇

中文开放获取期刊论文的引用优势分析——以《图书情报工作》为实证

王晨阳1,2)()(), 魏啸天1,2), 褚建勋1,2),*()(), 杨晓婷3)   

  1. 1) 中国科学技术大学人文与社会科学学院,安徽省合肥市包河区徽州大道1129号 230051
    2) 中国科学技术大学计算社会科学与融媒体研究所,安徽省合肥市包河区徽州大道1129号 230051
    3) 河南大学文化旅游学院,河南省开封市顺河回族区明伦街85号 475001
  • 收稿日期:2023-12-21 修回日期:2024-03-18 出版日期:2024-07-15 发布日期:2024-08-02
  • 通讯作者: 褚建勋
  • 作者简介:

    王晨阳(ORCID:0000-0002-9091-1400),博士研究生,E-mail:

    魏啸天,博士研究生

    杨晓婷,硕士研究生。

    作者贡献声明: 王晨阳:确定选题,设计研究思路,收集和分析数据,撰写、修改论文; 魏啸天:参与选题设计,收集数据,修改论文; 褚建勋:指导选题设计,指导论文撰写和修改; 杨晓婷:收集数据,修改论文。

Analysis of citation advantage of Chinese open access journal papers: An empirical analysis on Library and Information Service

WANG Chenyang1,2)()(), WEI Xiaotian1,2), CHU Jianxun1,2),*()(), YANG Xiaoting3)   

  1. 1) School of Humanities and Social Sciences, University of Science and Technology of China, 1129 Huizhou Avenue, Baohe District, Hefei 230051, China
    2) Institute for Computational Social Sciences and Media Studies, University of Science and Technology of China, 1129 Huizhou Avenue, Baohe District, Hefei 230051, China
    3) School of Culture and Tourism, Henan University, 85 Minglun Street, Shunhehuizu District, Kaifeng 475001, China
  • Received:2023-12-21 Revised:2024-03-18 Online:2024-07-15 Published:2024-08-02
  • Contact: CHU Jianxun

摘要:

【目的】 通过实证分析研究中文开放获取(Open Access,OA)期刊论文是否具有引用优势,为中文科技期刊OA转型提供实证注解和参考。【方法】 以《图书情报工作》2013—2021年发表的3949篇论文为样本,通过进行t检验、多元线性回归分析、倾向得分匹配及其回归分析、异质性检验等方式验证OA是否具有引用优势。【结果】 OA论文具有显著引用优势并且结论具有稳健性。此外,年度核心作者、第一作者单位级别对论文被引频次也具有显著正向影响。【结论】 建议中文期刊挖潜提升、对标国际,积极推动OA转型;加大对中文期刊OA转型的资助力度,健全集中的OA平台,促进我国中文期刊OA转型发展。

关键词: 开放获取, 中文科技期刊, 开放科学, 《图书情报工作》

Abstract:

[Purposes] This study employs empirical analysis to investigate whether Chinese open access (OA) journal papers confer a citation advantage, aiming to offer empirical annotations and references for the OA transformation of Chinese scientific journals. [Methods] We utilized a sample of 3949 papers published in Library and Information Service from 2013 to 2021 for t-tests, multiple linear regression analysis, propensity score matching and its regression analysis, and heterogeneity tests to verify whether OA enjoyed a citation advantage. [Findings] OA papers demonstrate a significant citation advantage, and the conclusions are robust. Furthermore, the annual core authors and the level of the first author's institution also exert a significant positive impact on the citation count of papers. [Conclusions] It is recommended that Chinese journals explore their potential for improvement, align with international standards, and actively promote the transformation to OA. Moreover, increasing funding for the OA transformation of Chinese journals, enhancing centralized OA platforms, and promoting the development of OA transformation of Chinese journals are advocated.

Key words: Open access, Chinese scientific journal, Open science, Library and Information Service