中国科技期刊研究 ›› 2025, Vol. 36 ›› Issue (8): 1016-1025. doi: 10.11946/cjstp.202505050459

• 论坛 • 上一篇    下一篇

学术出版商商业模式转型的背景、特征及启示——以五大国际学术出版集团为例

向佳丽1)()(), 陈春生2), 史淑英3), 黄崇亚3), 邱诗岑4)   

  1. 1) 厦门大学图书馆,福建省厦门市思明区思明南路422号 361005
    2) 福建师范大学社会历史学院,福建省福州市仓山区上三路8号 350007
    3) 西安交通大学期刊中心,陕西省西安市碑林区咸宁西路28号 710049
    4) 泉州信息工程学院图书馆,福建省泉州市丰泽区博东路249号 362000
  • 收稿日期:2025-05-05 修回日期:2025-07-21 出版日期:2025-08-25 发布日期:2025-09-08
  • 作者简介:

    向佳丽(ORCID: 0000-0001-6336-5953),硕士,副研究馆员,厦门大学图书馆采访部主任,E-mail:

    陈春生,硕士研究生

    史淑英,硕士,副编审,编辑

    黄崇亚,博士,编审,西安交通大学期刊中心理工版块总编辑

    邱诗岑,硕士,助理馆员。

    作者贡献声明: 向佳丽:确定研究方向,撰写修订论文; 陈春生:撰写论文; 史淑英:搭建论文框架,撰写修订论文; 黄崇亚:审核论文; 邱诗岑:参与修订论文。
  • 基金资助:
    国家社会科学基金项目“高校图书馆引进国外数字资源的合同风险防控体系研究”(21BTQ032)

Background, characteristics, and implications of the transformation of academic publishers’ business models: Taking the five major international academic publishing groups as an example

XIANG Jiali1)()(), CHEN Chunsheng2), SHI Shuying3), HUANG Chongya3), QIU Shicen4)   

  1. 1) Xiamen University Library,422 Siming South Road,Siming District,Xiamen 361005,China
    2) College of Sociology and History,Fujian Normal University,8 Shangsan Road,Cangshan District,Fuzhou 350007,China
    3) Periodicals Publishing House,Xi’an Jiaotong University,28 Xianning West Road,Beilin District,Xi’an 710049,China
    4) Quanzhou University of Information Engineering Library,249 Bodong Road,Fengze District,Quanzhou 362000,China
  • Received:2025-05-05 Revised:2025-07-21 Online:2025-08-25 Published:2025-09-08

摘要:

目的 对五大国际学术出版集团商业模式转型进行系统深入研究,为我国学术出版机构的转型发展总结经验启示。 方法 综合运用SWOT分析法、案例分析法和总结归纳法,对五大国际学术出版集团商业模式转型的背景、特征展开分析并总结经验启示。 结果 五大国际学术出版集团积极参与开放获取出版、持续整合科研服务平台和工具、协同升级为知识解决方案服务商、主动探索人工智能与优质资源的深度融合,在学术出版转型中抢占先机、强化市场影响力、拓展新的营收渠道、布局新兴业务模块。 结论 我国学术出版机构应以开放获取期刊建设为契机,主动融入开放学术交流生态系统转型;加强多元化经营,延伸学术出版产业链;以平台为支撑,推进期刊集群化建设;积极探索人工智能工具运用,深入挖掘学术资源价值。

关键词: 学术出版商, 学术出版, 商业模式转型, 开放科学

Abstract:

Purposes The purpose is to summarize experiences and lessons for the transformation and development of academic publishing institutions in China,through systematic and in-depth research into the business model transformation of the five major international academic publishing groups. Methods An integrated methodology combining SWOT analysis, case study research, and inductive summarization was systematically employed. Findings The five major international academic publishing groups actively participate in open access publishing, continuously integrate scientific research platforms and tools, collaboratively upgrade to knowledge solution providers, and proactively explore the deep integration of AI with high-quality resources, thereby seizing opportunities in the transformation of academic publishing, strengthening market influence, cultivating new revenue avenues, and developing emerging business segments. Conclusions China’s academic publishing institutions should seize the opportunity presented by the development of open access journals to actively merge into the transformation of open access scholarly ecosystem; strengthen business diversification to extend the academic publishing industry chain; integrate platforms as a key component to advance journal cluster development; and proactively explore the application of AI tools to extract the full potential value of academic resources.

Key words: Academic publishers, Scholarly publishing, Business model transformation, Open science