摘要：

【目的】 为满足科学共同体对科学研究公开、透明的需要，尝试探索预印本与开放评议深度融合的学术出版模式。【方法】 以学术出版现存问题为逻辑基点，探讨预印本、开放评议与学术出版的关系，并论述预印本与开放评议结合的理论可行性和实践可行性。在此基础上提出并概述“预印本+开放评议”模式，围绕出版流程、参与主体、核心特质、功能价值等4个方面阐释该模式的主要内涵与运行机理机制。【结果】 结合我国国情提出“预印本+开放评议”模式的实践策略：推动参与主体转变思想观念、循序渐进地公开各项内容、搭建学术期刊与已有预印本平台合作的桥梁、修订完善配套制度规范等。【结论】 研究成果能够为我国学术出版模式变革提供借鉴。

关键词: 学术出版模式, 审稿模式, 同行评议, “预印本+开放评议”模式

Abstract:

［Purposes］ To meet the scientific community's demand for openness and transparency in research, this study explores an academic publishing model that integrates preprints and open review. ［Methods］ Addressing current issues in academic publishing as the foundation, we examined the relationship between preprints, open review, and academic publishing. We discussed the theoretical and practical feasibility of combining preprints with open review. Based on this, we proposed and outlined the "preprint + open review" model, explaining its main concepts and operational mechanisms in terms of publishing processes, participant roles, core attributes, and functional values. ［Findings］ Tailored to China's national conditions, we suggest practical strategies for implementing the "preprint + open review" model: promoting a shift in the participant mindsets, gradually disclosing all content, fostering collaboration between academic journals and existing preprint platforms, and refining supportive regulatory frameworks. ［Conclusions］ The study offers insights to reform China's academic publishing model.

Key words: Academic publishing model, Review model, Peer review, Preprint + open review