摘要：

目的 剖析学/协会刊群与其学术共同体协同发展的瓶颈，构建二者协同发展路径，为学/协会刊群高质量建设与学术共同体良性发展提供理论参考与实践借鉴。方法 采用文献梳理、理论界定、对比分析与案例归纳相结合的方法，从资源整合、学术活动组织、学术服务优化、人才培养、学术规范共建5个维度，结合典型刊群实践，归纳协同发展的瓶颈并提出针对性路径。结果 明确了学/协会刊群视角下学术共同体的内涵及核心特征；揭示单刊协同呈单一化、精细化特征，学/协会刊群协同呈体系化、多元化特征，二者在5大维度差异显著；总结出协同发展的5大瓶颈，即规模优势难转化、学术活动质效失衡、服务同质化、人才培育脱节、规范落地不足；构建了6大维度的协同发展路径及落地举措。结论 学/协会刊群与学术共同体具备天然协同基础，通过完善资源共享、活动共建、服务共融等举措，可破解瓶颈，推动二者双向赋能、良性共生，助力我国科技期刊集群化与高质量发展。

关键词: 科技期刊集群, 学/协会, 学术共同体, 协同发展, 资源整合, 一流科技期刊建设

Abstract:

Purposes To analyze the practical bottlenecks in the collaborative development of society and association journal clusters and their academic communities， construct the collaborative development path between them， and provide theoretical reference and practical guidance for the high-quality construction of society and association journal clusters and the sound development of academic communities. Methods Adopting a combination of literature review， theoretical definition， comparative analysis and case induction， this paper summarizes the collaborative bottlenecks and proposes targeted paths from five dimensions （resource integration， academic activity organization， academic service optimization， talent training， and joint construction of academic norms） combined with the practice of typical journal clusters. Findings The connotation and core characteristics of society and association journal clusters and academic communities from the perspective of journal clusters are clarified； it is revealed that the collaboration of a single journal is characterized by singularity and refinement， while the collaboration of society and association journal clusters is characterized by systematization and diversification， with significant differences between the two in the five dimensions； the five major bottlenecks in collaborative development are summarized， namely， the difficulty in transforming scale advantages into collaborative effects， the imbalance between the scale and quality of academic activities， the homogenization of services， the disconnection in talent training， and the insufficient implementation of norms； a collaborative development path and implementation measures from six dimensions are constructed. Conclusions Society and association journal clusters and academic communities have a natural foundation for collaboration. By improving measures such as resource sharing， joint construction of activities， and integration of academic services， the bottlenecks can be broken， promoting two-way empowerment and sound coexistence between them， and helping the clustering and high-quality development of China’s scientific and technological journals.

Key words: Scientific journal cluster, Society and association, Academic community, Coordinated development, Resource integration, Cultivation of the first class scientific journals