摘要：

目的 探讨在建构中国自主知识体系的时代背景下，科技期刊如何通过出版实践赋能学科建设，进而服务国家战略需求。 方法 采用案例研究法，系统梳理《天文和天体物理学研究（英文）》（RAA）在依托国内重大科技设施、坚持科学家办刊、平衡国际化与自主性、引领学科发展等方面的创新实践，构建“期刊-学科-知识体系”三位一体分析框架。 结果 研究表明，RAA通过打造“设施-成果-期刊”良性循环、赋予科研人员学术话语权、探索非对称超越的国际化策略、凝聚天文学术共同体等举措，实现了期刊国际影响力与学科服务能力的双重提升，形成了重大成果牵引、学术共同体凝聚、本土化与国际化平衡3大协同机制。 结论 科技期刊应立足本土科研优势，找准定位，与学科建设协同推进，从成果发布者向知识体系建构者转型；同时建议优化科研评价体系，加大政策支持，为科技期刊高质量发展、助力中国自主知识体系建构提供实践参考与路径启示。

关键词: 自主知识体系, 学科建设, 科技期刊, 知识认证, 学术话语权

Abstract:

Purposes This paper explores how scientific journals can empower discipline development through publishing practices to serve national strategic needs， against the backdrop of constructing China’s independent knowledge system. Methods Using a case study approach， it systematically reviews the innovative practices of Research in Astronomy and Astrophysics （RAA） in leveraging major domestic scientific facilities， adhering to scientist-run journal management， balancing internationalization with autonomy， and leading disciplinary development. A tripartite analytical framework of “journal-discipline-knowledge system” is constructed. Findings The study finds that through measures such as establishing a virtuous cycle of “facility-achievement-journal”， granting researchers academic voice， pursuing asymmetric and transcendent internationalization strategies， and fostering an astronomical academic community， RAA has achieved dual improvements in international influence and disciplinary service capability. Three synergistic mechanisms have emerged： major achievement-driven traction， academic community cohesion， and localization-internationalization balance. Conclusions Scientific journals should leverage local research strengths to define their positioning， advance synergistically with discipline development， and transform from mere results publishers to constructors of knowledge systems. Additionally， it recommends optimizing research evaluation systems， increasing policy support， thereby providing practical references and pathways for the high-quality development of scientific journals and the construction of China’s independent knowledge system.

Key words: Independent knowledge system, Discipline development, Scientific journals, Knowledge certification, Academic discourse power