中国科技期刊研究 ›› 2024, Vol. 35 ›› Issue (8): 1144-1148. doi: 10.11946/cjstp.202401150047

• 评价与分析 • 上一篇    下一篇

F5000高水平论文特征及专家意见分析

盖双双1,2)()(), 俞征鹿1,2), 翟丽华1), 刘雪立3)   

  1. 1) 中国科学技术信息研究所科学计量与评价研究中心,北京市海淀区复兴路15号 100038
    2) 国家新闻出版署医学期刊知识挖掘与服务重点实验室,北京市西城区东河沿街69号 100052
    3) 新乡医学院人文社会科学学部,河南省新乡市金穗大道601号 453003
  • 收稿日期:2024-01-15 修回日期:2024-04-15 出版日期:2024-08-15 发布日期:2024-09-10
  • 作者简介:

    盖双双(ORCID:0000-0001-6483-6024),博士,助理研究员,E-mail:

    俞征鹿,硕士,研究员;

    翟丽华,博士,研究员;

    刘雪立,学士,教授。

    作者贡献声明: 盖双双:设计论文框架,分析数据,撰写论文; 俞征鹿,翟丽华,刘雪立:修订论文。

Analysis of the characteristics and experts' opinions of F5000 high-level papers

GAI Shuangshuang1,2)()(), YU Zhenglu1,2), ZHAI Lihua1), LIU Xueli3)   

  1. 1) Science Evaluation Research Center, Institute of Scientific and Technical Information of China, 15 Fuxing Road, Haidian District, Beijing 100038, China
    2) Key Laboratory of Knowledge Mining and Service for Medical Journals, National Press and Publication Administration, 69 Dongheyan Street, Xicheng District, Beijing 100052, China
    3) Faculty of Humanities & Social Sciences, Xinxiang Medical University, 601 Jinsui Road, Xinxiang 453003, China
  • Received:2024-01-15 Revised:2024-04-15 Online:2024-08-15 Published:2024-09-10

摘要:

【目的】 为期刊规范审稿机制、有效甄选优秀稿件提供参考。【方法】 以2017—2021年我国精品期刊编辑部推荐的F5000高水平论文及推荐意见为分析对象,采用文献计量学方法和内容分析法,对F5000高水平论文的特征和专家意见进行分析。【结果】 推荐F5000高水平论文越积极的期刊,影响力越高。我国期刊发表的部分论文具有较高应用价值。国家级基金项目资助产出较多高水平论文。创新性、前瞻性、实用性(学术价值和应用价值)、科学性、规范性是同行专家评选高水平论文的重要标准。【结论】 重大科研项目是我国高水平论文产出的重要支撑。期刊应充分利用各种学术传播平台提高自身显示度和影响力,并在产学研融合中积极发挥桥梁作用。

关键词: 学术论文, 论文评价, 高水平论文, 评审意见

Abstract:

[Purposes] This paper aims to provide references for standardizing the review mechanism of journals and effectively selecting excellent manuscripts. [Methods] Taking the F5000 high-level papers recommended by the editorial department of high-quality journals in China from 2017 to 2021 as objects, bibliometric methods and content analysis methods were utilized to analyze the characteristics and experts' opinions of F5000 high-level papers. [Findings] As a journal more actively recommends F5000 high-level papers, its influence is higher. The application value of some papers published in China's high-quality journals is relatively high. In comparison, national fund projects contribute to more high-level papers. During the selection of high-level papers, peer-review experts follow important criteria: whether the paper is innovative, forward-looking, practical (with academic value and application value), scientific, and normative. [Conclusions] Major scientific research projects strongly support the output of high-level papers in China. Journals should fully utilize various academic communication platforms to enhance their visibility and influence and actively play their roles in bridging industry, academia, and research.

Key words: Academic paper, Paper evaluation, High-level journal paper, Review comment