摘要：

【目的】调查自我效能感视角下医学期刊编辑岗位胜任力现状及其影响因素,为医学期刊编辑人才的培养提供参考。【方法】在文献研究的基础上,采用自行设计的医学期刊编辑岗位胜任力自评量表,对医学期刊编辑进行调查,并对调查结果进行统计分析。【结果】医学期刊编辑的岗位胜任力总均分为79.77±12.24分,处于中等水平,技能和知识维度得分较低。单因素方差分析结果显示,医学期刊编辑的岗位胜任力在性别、年龄、最高学历、工作年限、专业背景、职称以及所在期刊类别上的差异有统计学意义(P<0.001)。多元线性逐步回归分析显示,工作年限、最高学历、专业背景、自我效能感是医学期刊编辑岗位胜任力的主要影响因素(P<0.001)。医学期刊编辑的自我效能感总均分为2.72±0.51分,与岗位胜任力总均分呈正相关关系(P<0.05)。【结论】医学期刊编辑总体胜任力水平存在上升空间。建议促进编研结合,注重提升科研能力和鉴别学术不端的能力;按需施教,丰富医学期刊编辑继续教育形式;利用积极心理学引导编辑保持积极情绪和心理健康,给予更多人文关怀以增强其自我效能感,从而提升医学期刊编辑的整体胜任力水平。

关键词: 医学期刊编辑, 岗位胜任力, 影响因素, 自我效能感

Abstract:

[Purposes] This paper aims to investigate the current situation and influencing factors of post competency of medical journal editors from the perspective of self-efficacy and provide references for training medical journal editors. [Methods] On the basis of literature research, the self-designed post competency scale for medical journal editors was used to investigate medical journal editors, and the survey results were statistically analyzed. [Findings] The total post competency score of medical journal editors is 79.77±12.24 on average, which is in the medium level, and the scores of skills and knowledge are low. Univariate analysis of variance shows that there are statistically significant differences (P<0.001) in post competency of medical journal editors in terms of gender, age, education level, working years, professional background, professional title, and journal category. Multiple linear stepwise regression analysis shows that working years, education level, professional background, and self-efficacy are the main factors affecting the post competency of medical journal editors (P<0.001). The total average score of self-efficacy of medical journal editors is 2.72±0.51, which is positively correlated with the total average score of post competency (P<0.05). [Conclusions] The general competence level of medical journal editors still has room for improvement. It is suggested to promote the combination of editing and research, pay attention to the enhancement of scientific research ability and the ability to identify academic misconduct, teach according to demand, and enrich the form of continuing education for medical journal editors. Meanwhile, positive psychology should be used to guide editors to maintain positive emotions and mental health, and more humanistic care is required to enhance their sense of self-efficacy, so as to improve the overall competence of medical journal editors.

Key words: Medical journal editor, Post competency, Influencing factor, Self-efficacy