【目的】 探讨医学科技期刊编辑在论文审理中应遵循的伦理学原则,以提高编辑对科研和出版伦理学的认识。【方法】 通过阅读文献并梳理工作经验,总结医学科技期刊编辑在论文审理中应遵循的伦理学原则。【结果】 在涉及人的生物医学研究伦理审查中,编辑应审查作者是否遵循知情同意原则、无伤害和有利原则、特殊保护原则;在涉及动物的生物医学研究伦理审查中,编辑应审查作者是否遵循3R原则;其他伦理学原则包括诚信原则、公平公正原则、保密原则和谨慎负责原则。【结论】 医学科技期刊编辑应根据论文类型遵循不同的伦理学原则进行论文审理,以提高审稿能力和出版质量。
[Purposes] This paper aims to investigate the ethics principles that should be followed by editors of medical scientific journals in paper review to deepen editors' understanding of scientific research and publishing ethics. [Methods] Through article reading and summary of work experience, the ethics principles that should be followed by editors of medical scientific journals in paper review were summed up. [Findings] The ethics principles that should be followed by editors in paper review of biomedical research involving human beings include informed consent, non-maleficence and benefit, and special protection. The ethics principle that should be followed by editors in paper review of biomedical research involving animal is 3R. Other ethics principles include sincerity, equity and justice, confidentiality, and prudent and responsibility. [Conclusions] Editors of medical scientific journals should follow different ethics principles in paper review according to the paper type, in order to improve the reviewing ability and publication quality.
Medical journal editor,