中国科技期刊研究 ›› 2015, Vol. 26 ›› Issue (9): 931-934. doi: 10.11946/cjstp.201505230461

• 论坛 • 上一篇    下一篇

科技期刊注重科技伦理评估的做法及实例分析

史春薇,赵杉林,陈平,王亚新   

  1. 辽宁石油化工大学,辽宁省抚顺市望花区丹东路西段一号 113001
  • 收稿日期:2015-05-23 修回日期:2015-08-08 出版日期:2015-09-15 发布日期:2015-09-15
  • 作者简介:史春薇(ORCID:0000-0002-6908-4842),博士研究生,编辑,E-mail: c08271827@126.com

Research on the evaluation of scientific and technical ethics and the role of themedia in the scientific journals

,ZHAO Shanlin,CHEN Ping,WANG Yaxin   

  1. Liaoning Shihua University,1 Dandong Road,Wanghua District,Fushun 113001,China
  • Received:2015-05-23 Revised:2015-08-08 Online:2015-09-15 Published:2015-09-15

摘要:

【目的】促进科技期刊的正确导向,提升科技期刊对科技伦理的重视程度,加强普通科技期刊进行科技伦理评估的力度。【方法】阐述了科技期刊重视科技伦理评估的道德意义,提出了科技伦理评估的具体做法。【结果】发现通过消除伪科技伦理谣言、关注国际科技伦理的热点、刊发前瞻性科技伦理专业论文、结合新闻热点约稿、解疑释惑等方法是科技期刊实现科技论文评估的具体途径。【结果】科技期刊论文的科技伦理评估还在起步阶段,需要进一步完善伦理委员会的审查、监督体系,提高作者和编辑的科技伦理学意识等等。

关键词: 科技期刊, 科技伦理, 正导向, 道德建设, 评估

Abstract:

[Purposes] This study promotes the correct guidance of the scientific journals,highlights the ethics of scientific journals,and strengths the intensity of general scientific journals to assess the ethics of science and technology.[Methods] This paper expounds scientific journals,attaches great importance to themoral significance of ethical review of science and technology,and puts forward the specific method evaluating the ethical review of science and technology.[Findings] Some methods elim inate the pseudo science and technology ethical rumors.Some focus on the international hotspotsw ith scientific ethics,publish proactive ethics of scientific and technical theses,and combine w ith the newsmanuscripts,and so on.Scientific journals using the above methods can realize the ethical reviews.[Conclusions] Ethical reviews of science and technology for scientific journals are still in their infancy.It is necessary to further improve the exam ination system of the ethical comm ittee,and the scientific and technical ethical consciousness of authors and editors.

Key words: Scientific journal, Scientific and technical ethics, Positive guidance, Moral construction, Assessment