中国科技期刊研究 ›› 2022, Vol. 33 ›› Issue (2): 139-149. doi: 10.11946/cjstp.202108290691

• 专题:学术诚信伦理建设 •    下一篇

国外科技期刊出版伦理研究述评

解贺嘉1,2)(), 初景利1,2)   

  1. 1)中国科学院文献情报中心,北京市海淀区中关村北四环西路33号 100190
    2)中国科学院大学经济与管理学院图书情报与档案管理系,北京市海淀区中关村北四环西路33号 100190
  • 收稿日期:2021-08-29 修回日期:2022-01-24 出版日期:2022-02-15 发布日期:2022-02-15
  • 作者简介:解贺嘉(ORCID:0000-0002-7727-7927),博士研究生,E-mail: xiehejia@mail.las.ac.cn;|初景利,博士,教授,博士生导师。

Review of publishing ethics of scientific journals abroad

XIE Hejia1,2)(), CHU Jingli1,2)   

  1. 1) National Science Library, Chinese Academy of Sciences, 33 Beisihuan Xilu, Zhongguancun, Haidian District, Beijing 100190, China
    2) Department of Library, Information and Archives Management, School of Economics and Management, University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, 33 Beisihuan Xilu, Zhongguancun, Haidian District, Beijing 100190, China
  • Received:2021-08-29 Revised:2022-01-24 Online:2022-02-15 Published:2022-02-15

摘要:

【目的】 梳理国外学者对科技期刊出版伦理的研究成果,为我国科技期刊出版伦理的研究提供参考。【方法】 采用文献综述法和内容编码法,对国外已有研究成果进行系统总结和提炼,梳理研究现状,分析存在的问题,展望未来发展趋势。【结果】 国外已有的出版伦理相关研究成果主要包括5个研究主题:出版伦理失范、出版伦理规范、出版伦理实施现状、作者和编辑对出版伦理的认知和态度、出版伦理治理。【结论】 国外关于科技期刊出版伦理的研究成果丰硕,特征明显,但也存在缺乏研究范畴界定和对伦理规范的系统分析等问题。我国科技期刊出版伦理规范体系的建设应加强对国际研究成果的借鉴以及对规范文本的研究。

关键词: 科技期刊, 出版伦理, 伦理规范, 伦理失范, 伦理治理

Abstract:

[Purposes] This paper aims to summarize the research outcome on publishing ethics of scientific journals abroad, which is expected to serve as a reference for the research on related topics in China. [Methods] Literature review method and content coding method were adopted to systematically sum up related research abroad. Then, the status quo and development trend were analyzed. [Findings] There are five main research topics: anomy of publishing ethics, elements of publishing ethics norms, status quo of publishing ethics implementation, knowledge of authors and editors on publishing ethics and their attitudes, and management of publishing ethics. [Conclusions] Foreign research on publishing ethics of scientific journals has achieved fruitful results with obvious characteristics, but there is a lack of research scope definition and systematic analysis of ethical norms. Chinese scientific journals should take international research outcome as a reference and strengthen the research on ethical norms to enhance the development of publishing ethics.

Key words: Scientific journal, Publishing ethics, Ethical norm, Ethical anomy, Ethical management