摘要：

目的 在当前科技自立自强与决策科学化需求日益迫切的背景下，探讨部分具有应用导向和区域服务特色的科技期刊如何超越传统学术传播，有效发挥决策咨询和产业赋能等智库功能，对于提升期刊服务国家战略能力具有重要意义。 方法 以具有典型性的中国科学院西北生态环境资源研究院刊群为案例，采用案例分析法与归纳演绎法，系统梳理其在服务西北生态安全、资源开发等国家战略中的实践，提炼出其构建“学科协同桥-产业对接桥-决策支撑桥”三位一体服务模式的路径与方法。 结果 研究发现，此刊群通过以区域战略问题为导向组织跨学科研究、以企业技术需求为牵引推动成果转化、以政策制定场景为目标凝练智库产品，初步形成了学术知识向产业价值与决策效能转化的闭环。 结论 “三维桥梁”模式为同类面向国家战略与区域发展的科技期刊群拓展智库功能提供了可借鉴的实践范式，其成功关键在于紧密对接现实需求、有效整合内外部资源、并实现“学科-产业-决策”三者的良性互动与价值循环。未来，需在跨学科协同深度、产业对接量化评估及长效资源保障等方面进一步优化。

关键词: 智库, “三维桥梁”模式, 战略区域服务

Abstract:

Purposes In the context of increasing demand for scientific and technological self-reliance and evidence-based policy making， exploring how applied and regionally-focused scientific journals can effectively leverage think tank functions， such as policy consultation and industrial enablement， beyond traditional academic dissemination， is of great significance for enhancing journals’ capacity to serve national strategies. Methods Taking the representative journal cluster of the Northwest Institute of Eco-Environment and Resources （NIEER）， Chinese Academy of Sciences as a case study， this research employs case analysis and inductive-deductive methods to systematically review its practices in serving national strategies like ecological security and resource development in Northwest China. It extracts the pathway and methodology of constructing a trinity service model comprising the “disciplinary synergy bridge” “industrial engagement bridge”， and “decision support bridge”. Findings The study finds that the NIEER journal cluster has initially formed a closed-loop for transforming academic knowledge into industrial value and decision-making efficacy. This is achieved by organizing interdisciplinary research oriented towards regional strategic issues， promoting knowledge translation driven by enterprise technological needs， and distilling think tank products targeted at policy-making scenarios. Conclusions The “three-dimensional bridge” model provides a replicable practical paradigm for similar scientific journal clusters serving national strategies and regional development to expand their think tank functions. Its success hinges on closely aligning with practical demands， effectively integrating internal and external resources， and fostering a virtuous cycle of interaction and value flow among “discipline-industry-decision”. Future efforts should focus on deepening interdisciplinary collaboration， improving the quantitative assessment of industrial engagement， and securing long-term resource support.

Key words: Think tank, “Three-dimensional bridge” model, Strategic regional service