摘要：

【目的】对我国当前学术期刊出版领域研究机构的整体发展水平进行摸底调研，反映当前业界对学术期刊出版智库的实践和认知，揭示我国学术期刊出版智库的发展态势，以期推动学术期刊出版智库研究和学术期刊出版智库咨询服务，为学术期刊出版领域相关政策制定提供参考借鉴。【方法】通过发放调查问卷，调研包括学术期刊编辑部、学术期刊学/协会、高校相关院系、学术期刊相关研究院所，以及学术期刊相关企业在内的开展期刊出版领域研究的机构，用统计分析方法和案例分析方法分析探讨当前学术期刊出版智库的发展现状及存在的问题，并提出学术期刊出版智库影响力提升策略。【结果】总体来看，期刊出版领域的智库研究成果产出少、被决策层采纳的少，从业人员规模体量小，智库研究课题的经费来源单一，智库功能未能有效发挥。我国学术期刊出版智库建设仍具有较大的发展空间。【结论】建议相关管理部门加强对期刊出版智库行业发展的指导，期刊出版领域研究机构应加强成果转化并拓展经费来源，明确从事智库研究工作的使命定位、树立对标机构，加强对期刊从业人员智库研究素养的培养，运用智能化期刊数据平台工具开展智库研究，加强出版智库间的交流与合作。

关键词: 学术期刊, 出版领域研究机构, 出版智库, 期刊出版智库, 智库影响力

Abstract:

[Purposes] This paper surveys the overall development level of research institutions engaged in the field of academic journal publishing in China. It reflects the current practice and understanding of academic journal publishing think tanks in the industry, revealing their development trend in China. The aim is to promote research on academic journal publishing think tanks and consulting services, providing a reference for relevant policy formulation in the field. [Methods] We conducted research via questionnaire surveys on various institutions involved in journal publishing research, including academic journal editorial departments, academies, associations, relevant university departments, research institutes, and journal-related enterprises. We used statistical analysis and case analysis methods to analyze the current development status and challenges of academic journal publishing think tanks, proposing strategies to enhance their influence. [Findings] Overall, the output of think tank research results in journal publishing is low, with limited adoption by decision-makers. The personnel scale in the industry is small and the funding sources are single. The function of think tanks has not been effectively utilized. However, significant potential remains for developing academic journal publishing think tanks in China. [Conclusions] Relevant management departments are recommended to enhance guidance on the development of the journal think tank industry. Research institutions should enhance the transformation of achievements and diversify funding sources. They should clarify the strategic positioning of think tank research, establish benchmarking institutions, enhance think tank research literacy among journal practitioners, use intelligent journal data platform tools for research, and foster communication and cooperation among publishing think tanks.

Key words: Academic journal, Publishing research institution, Publishing think tank, Journal publishing think tank, Think tank influence