中国科技期刊研究 ›› 2024, Vol. 35 ›› Issue (1): 36-42. doi: 10.11946/cjstp.202306140439

• 论坛 • 上一篇    下一篇

面向开放科学的中国学术期刊出版与交流模式重构

赵文青1)()(), 狄冀丰2), 宗明刚3),*()(), 胡绍君4)   

  1. 1) 江苏大学杂志社,江苏省镇江市学府路301号 212013
    2) 江苏大学科技信息研究所,江苏省镇江市学府路301号 212013
    3) 江苏大学财经学院,江苏省镇江市学府路301号 212013
    4) 徐州工程学院管理工程学院,江苏省徐州市丽水路2号 221018
  • 收稿日期:2023-06-14 修回日期:2023-10-30 出版日期:2024-01-15 发布日期:2024-01-30
  • 通讯作者: * 宗明刚(ORCID:0000-0002-1964-0214),博士,副教授,E-mail:
  • 作者简介:

    赵文青(ORCID:0000-0003-1822-7345),硕士,副编审,E-mail:;

    狄冀丰,硕士研究生;

    胡绍君,博士,副教授。

    作者贡献声明: 赵文青:提出研究选题,设计研究框架,撰写、修改论文; 狄冀丰:查找文献,撰写、修改论文; 宗明刚:提出研究思路,修改论文; 胡绍君:调研文献与案例,修改论文。
  • 基金资助:
    国家社会科学基金“行动者网络理论视角下我国建设世界一流科技期刊的机制研究”(23BXW119)

Reconstruction of publishing and communication mode of Chinese academic journals in the context of open science

ZHAO Wenqing1)()(), DI Jifeng2), ZONG Minggang3)()(), HU Shaojun4)   

  1. 1) Periodical Press of Jiangsu University, 301 Xuefu Road, Zhenjiang 212013, China
    2) Institute of Science and Technology Information, Jiangsu University, 301 Xuefu Road, Zhenjiang 212013, China
    3) School of Finance & Economics, Jiangsu University, 301 Xuefu Road, Zhenjiang 212013, China
    4) School of Management Engineering, Xuzhou University of Technology, 2 Lishui Road, Xuzhou 221018, China
  • Received:2023-06-14 Revised:2023-10-30 Online:2024-01-15 Published:2024-01-30

摘要:

【目的】 为应对开放科学给学术期刊带来的挑战,提出构建开放出版与学术交流新模式并以平台思维运营之,以期为中国学术期刊在开放科学下的发展提供理论建议和实践参考。【方法】 通过采用文献调研、网络分析、案例分析、思辨研究等方法,对中国学术期刊开放科学实践现状及问题进行分析总结,在此基础上,基于系统分析法提出构建一个以平台思维运营的开放出版与学术交流新模式。【结果】 中国学术期刊在具体的开放科学实践中存在多元出版格局未建立、重传播渠道建设轻知识内容服务、开放同行评议任重道远、学术期刊平台运营思维欠缺等不足。【结论】 以平台思维运营的中国学术期刊出版与学术交流新模式包括多元融合出版、开放学术交流、科研全流程支持等主要功能。

关键词: 开放科学, 学术期刊, 开放出版, 学术交流, 平台思维

Abstract:

[Purposes] In order to cope with the challenges brought by open science to academic journals, this paper proposes to construct a new model of open publishing and academic exchange and operate it with platform thinking, so as to provide theoretical suggestions and practical references for the development of Chinese academic journals in the context of open science. [Methods] By using literature research, network analysis, case analysis, speculative research, and other methods, this paper summarized the current situation and problems of open science practice in Chinese academic journals. Then, based on system analysis, it proposed to construct a new model of open publishing and academic exchange and operate it with platform thinking. [Findings] In the specific open science practice of Chinese academic journals, there are shortcomings such as the lack of establishment of a diversified publishing pattern, the emphasis on communication channel construction rather than knowledge content service, the arduous task of open peer review, and insufficient operational thinking of academic journal platforms. [Conclusions] The new mode of publishing and academic exchange of Chinese academic journals operated with platform thinking includes the main functions of a diversified integrated publishing platform, open academic exchange system, and support services for the whole process of scientific research.

Key words: Open science, Academic journal, Open publishing, Academic exchange, Platform thinking