中国科技期刊研究 ›› 2022, Vol. 33 ›› Issue (3): 296-304. doi: 10.11946/cjstp.202109230750

• 质量建设 • 上一篇    下一篇

学术论文审稿效用研究——以国际会议ICLR同行评议为例

赵昕航(), 丁堃, 孙曰君, 张春博, 林原(), 高成锴   

  1. 大连理工大学,辽宁省大连市甘井子区凌工路2号 116024
  • 收稿日期:2021-09-23 修回日期:2022-02-18 出版日期:2022-03-15 发布日期:2022-04-15
  • 通讯作者: 林原 E-mail:xinhang@mail.dlut.edu.cn;zhlin@dlut.edu.cn
  • 作者简介:赵昕航(ORCID:0000-0002-5052-3649),硕士研究生,E-mail: xinhang@mail.dlut.edu.cn|丁堃,博士,教授,博士生导师;孙曰君,硕士研究生|张春博,博士研究生|高成锴,硕士,中级,研究生院学位管理科科长
  • 基金资助:
    国家自然科学基金面上项目“融合多源信息的学术推荐研究”(61976036)

Effectiveness of peer review on academic papers: Taking the peer review in ICLR as an example

ZHAO Xinhang(), DING Kun, SUN Yuejun, ZHANG Chunbo, LIN Yuan(), GAO Chengkai   

  1. Dalian University of Technology, 2 Linggong Road, Ganjingzi District, Dalian 116024, China
  • Received:2021-09-23 Revised:2022-02-18 Online:2022-03-15 Published:2022-04-15
  • Contact: LIN Yuan E-mail:xinhang@mail.dlut.edu.cn;zhlin@dlut.edu.cn

摘要:

【目的】 基于国际表征学习会议(International Conference on Learning Representations,ICLR)同行评议的文本分析,利用自然语言处理方法探索同行评议中审稿意见效用的评估方法。【方法】 首先定义审稿效用的概念,然后对审稿文本进行标注,应用表示学习与深度学习模型提出一种审稿效用度智能识别方法。【结果】 所提出的智能识别方法能够快速、有效地进行分析,获得审稿文本的效用度。负面审稿意见以及录用论文对应的审稿意见的审稿效用更高,论文水平与审稿专家经验是审稿效用的重要决定因素,中国审稿专家的审稿水平可能与世界平均水平相当。【结论】 应用审稿效用度智能识别方法能够及时发现异常的审稿文本,辅助编委和编辑做出审稿最终决定,改善同行评议评价结果,进而健全同行评议机制。

关键词: 同行评议, 审稿效用, 智能识别, 文本分析

Abstract:

[Purposes] Based on the text analysis of peer review of International Conference on Learning Representations (ICLR), natural language processing methods are used to explore the method for evaluating the effectiveness of peer review comments. [Methods] We first defined review effectiveness, then annotated the review texts, and proposed an intelligent identification method for review effectiveness with representation learning and deep learning models. [Findings] The proposed intelligent recognition method can efficiently analyze and yield the effectiveness of review text. Negative review comments and review comments on the papers accepted are more effective. The level of papers and the experience of reviewers are determinants of review effectiveness. The reviewing ability of Chinese reviewers reaches the world average. [Conclusions] The intelligent identification method can help identify abnormal review texts in time, assist the editorial board members and editors in the final decision-making, and improve the evaluation results of peer review and the peer review mechanism.

Key words: Peer review, Review effectiveness, Intelligent identification, Text analysis