中国科技期刊研究 ›› 2022, Vol. 33 ›› Issue (8): 1088-1097. doi: 10.11946/cjstp.202111230909

• 数字出版 • 上一篇    下一篇

国外学术期刊科学数据政策质性分析与内容要素研究

王德庄1,2)()(), 姜鑫3)   

  1. 1)黑龙江大学图书馆,黑龙江省哈尔滨市学府路74号 150080
    2)黑龙江大学信息管理学院,黑龙江省哈尔滨市学府路74号 150080
    3)黑龙江大学信息资源管理研究中心,黑龙江省哈尔滨市学府路74号 150080
  • 收稿日期:2021-11-23 修回日期:2022-04-26 出版日期:2022-08-15 发布日期:2022-09-02
  • 作者简介:

    王德庄(ORCID:0000-0003-4368-437X),博士研究生,副研究馆员,E-mail: ;

    姜 鑫,博士,教授,硕士生导师。

    作者贡献声明: 王德庄:整理与分析数据,撰写与修订论文; 姜 鑫:设计研究框架,撰写与修订论文。
  • 基金资助:
    黑龙江省哲学社会科学研究规划项目“基于政策文本分析的科学数据开放政策协同研究”(21TQB114); 黑龙江省高校基本科研业务费专项资金项目“政策科学视角下科学数据开放政策协同研究”(2020-KYYWF-0959)

Qualitative analysis and content elements of scientific data policies of foreign academic journals

WANG Dezhuang1,2)()(), JIANG Xin3)   

  1. 1) Library of Heilongjiang University, 74 Xuefu Road, Harbin 150080, China
    2) College of Information Management, Heilongjiang University, 74 Xuefu Road, Harbin 150080, China
    3) Research Center of Information Resources Management, Heilongjiang University, 74 Xuefu Road, Harbin 150080, China
  • Received:2021-11-23 Revised:2022-04-26 Online:2022-08-15 Published:2022-09-02

摘要:

【目的】针对国外学术期刊科学数据政策展开政策评估分析并提炼政策内容要素,以期为制定与完善国内现行学术期刊科学数据政策提出相关政策建议。【方法】选取国外学术出版商和学术组织两类学术出版机构最新发布的学术期刊科学数据政策,利用质性文本分析法构建政策文本分析类目体系、展开政策评估分析并提炼政策内容要素。【结果】依据国外学术期刊科学数据政策评估分析结果,针对国内学术出版机构的政策制定与完善提出相关政策建议。【结论】建议参考与借鉴国外学术出版机构的科学数据政策实践,尽快制定与调整国内现行学术期刊科学数据政策,补充与完善其科学数据政策的核心政策内容要素,并注重与其他利益相关者制定的科学数据政策之间保持协调一致。

关键词: 学术期刊, 科学数据, 科学数据政策, 政策文本分析, 质性文本分析, Nvivo 12

Abstract:

[Purposes] This paper evaluates the scientific data policies of foreign academic journals, summarizes the content elements, and thereby puts forward suggestions for formulation and improvement of related policies in China. [Methods] The latest scientific data policies of academic journals of foreign academic publishers and academic organizations were selected and a policy text analysis coding system was constructed based on qualitative text analysis, followed by policy assessment analysis and extraction of policy content elements. [Findings] We propose suggestions for the formulation and improvement of current scientific data policies of domestic academic publishers in accordance with the assessment results of the foreign policies. [Conclusions] With reference to the analysis result of scientific data policies of foreign academic publishers, efforts should be made by the counterparts in China to formulate and adjust the current scientific data policies, supplement and improve the core content elements, and make the policies comply with those formulated by other stakeholders.

Key words: Academic journal, Scientific data, Scientific data policy, Policy text analysis, Qualitative text analysis, Nvivo 12