摘要：

【目的】 聚焦开放同行评议中“内容公开”这个方面,提出实施同行评议内容公开的具体建议及优化策略,以期为我国科技期刊开放同行评议出版实践提供参考。【方法】 利用文献梳理、数据库检索、网络查询方法掌握国际开放同行评议期刊现状,并通过案例法对已经实施同行评议内容公开的几种典型期刊进行案例分析。通过问卷调查、个别访谈方法了解磁共振学科领域学者对同行评议内容公开的态度和见解,以及对各种措施的认可程度和倾向性。【结果】 基于调研分析结果,归纳对比同行评议内容公开不同实施细节上的优势、劣势;针对同行评议内容公开的科技期刊出版实践,分别从公开要素、呈现方式和内容选择性以及解决“审稿人压力大”和“稿件处理周期延迟”问题这4个具体方面,梳理总结出一系列可供借鉴的实施方案并提出若干条具体的策略建议。【结论】 我国科技期刊开放同行评议无论是体量还是创新模式都落后于国外大型出版集团。我国相关领域期刊推行同行评议内容公开具备领域内学者意愿基础,是有必要并完全可行的。基于所提出的同行评议内容公开实施策略建议,我国科技期刊可积极地、逐步地探索开放同行评议的创新实践,促进我国期刊学术出版中的同行评议向着更加开放、透明、高效的方向发展。

关键词: 同行评议, 内容公开, 调研分析, 策略建议

Abstract:

[Purposes] This paper focuses on "content disclosure" of peer review and proposes specific suggestions and optimization strategies, thereby providing a reference for the publication practice of open peer review of scientific journals in China. [Methods] The current status of international open peer-reviewed journals was grasped through literature review, database retrieval, and internet search, and several typical journals that have implemented peer-reviewed content disclosure were analyzed by case study. Questionnaires and individual interviews were used to understand the attitudes and opinions of scholars in the field of magnetic resonance toward peer-reviewed content disclosure, as well as the degree of recognition and tendency of various measures. [Findings] The advantages and disadvantages of different implementation details of peer-reviewed content disclosure were compared based on the results of the investigation and analysis. For the publication practice of scientific journals with peer-reviewed content disclosure, feasible solutions were summarized and strategy suggestions were made in four aspects: content elements, presentation methods, selectivity of papers, and solution to high pressure of reviewer and delay in manuscript processing cycle. [Conclusions] The open peer review of Chinese scientific journals lags behind foreign publishing groups to a certain extent, both in terms of the number and innovation model. The implementation of peer-reviewed content disclosure in Chinese journals in related fields is necessary and fully feasible based on the willingness of scholars in the field. By following the proposed implementation strategies for peer-reviewed content disclosure, Chinese scientific journals can actively and gradually explore the innovative practice of open peer review and try to realize a more open, transparent, and efficient peer review in academic publishing of Chinese journals.

Key words: Peer review, Content disclosure, Investigation and analysis, Strategy suggestion