中国科技期刊研究 ›› 2020, Vol. 31 ›› Issue (11): 1379-1387. doi: 10.11946/cjstp.202004220406

• 评论与分析 • 上一篇    下一篇

我国出版伦理研究态势的文献计量学分析

李玉乐(), 李娜, 刘洋, 孙静()   

  1. 中国医学科学院 北京协和医学院 北京协和医院《协和医学杂志》编辑部,北京市东城区帅府园1号 100730
  • 收稿日期:2020-04-22 修回日期:2020-07-27 出版日期:2020-11-15 发布日期:2020-11-15
  • 通讯作者: 孙静 E-mail:liyule112@sina.com;sunjing2000@163.com
  • 作者简介:李玉乐(ORCID:0000-0001-6417-6708),硕士,编辑,E-mail: liyule112@sina.com。|李娜,硕士研究生,编辑。|刘洋,学士,编辑。

Bibliometric analysis on the research trend of publication ethics in China

LI Yule(), LI Na, LIU Yang, SUN Jing()   

  1. Editorial Office of Medical Journal of Peking Union Medical College Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences & Peking Union Medical College Hospital, 1 Shuaifuyuan, Dongcheng District, Beijing 100730, China
  • Received:2020-04-22 Revised:2020-07-27 Online:2020-11-15 Published:2020-11-15
  • Contact: SUN Jing E-mail:liyule112@sina.com;sunjing2000@163.com

摘要:

【目的】 探讨我国出版伦理研究发展现状及趋势,为出版伦理相关研究的进一步开展提供借鉴和参考,以提升我国期刊的学术质量。【方法】 采用文献计量学方法对2008—2019年我国出版伦理领域研究成果进行定量分析,从文献发表年份、作者、地区、机构/单位、期刊、研究主题等方面进行深入分析。【结果】 国内出版伦理领域相关文献总体呈增长趋势;出版伦理问题日益受到社会的关注和重视;出版伦理相关研究视野比较狭窄,研究深度和广度不够,文献质量整体不高;研究人员之间缺乏协作,地区及单位间的合作有待加强。【结论】 我国出版伦理建设具有良好的基础,建议应规范和完善出版伦理学科体系建设,深入开展出版伦理学术研究,强化出版伦理宣传教育,充分发挥其在提高刊物质量、增进社会效益等方面的积极作用。

关键词: 出版伦理, 科研诚信, 学术不端, 期刊质量, 文献计量学

Abstract:

[Purposes] This paper is to analyze the current status and development trends of publication ethics in China, and to provide theoretical guidance and references for further research and development, so as to improve the academic quality of periodicals in China. [Methods] Based on CNKI and VIP databases, the literatures on publication ethics published in China's journals from 2008 to 2019 were analyzed by bibliometrics method. A statistic analysis on the distributions of published years, authors, regions, affiliations, journals, and research subjects was conducted. [Findings] The research on publication ethics is increasing. Publication ethics has received increasing attention from the government and society. The scope of the studies on publication ethics is relatively narrow, the studies are superficial, and the literature quality is not high. Cross-regional and interagency cooperations on publication ethics are not enough, and cooperation between regions and agencies should be strengthened. [Conclusions] The construction of publication ethics has a good foundation in China. We propose that the construction of publication ethics discipline system should be standardized and improved, the academic research on publication ethics should be developed deeply, and the publicity and education on publication ethics should be strengthened. Only in this way can it give full play to its positive role in improving publication quality and enhancing social benefits.

Key words: Publication ethics, Research integrity, Academic misconduct, Periodical quality, Bibliometrics