中国科技期刊研究 ›› 2016, Vol. 27 ›› Issue (8): 831-837. doi: 10.11946/cjstp.201605310467

• 领跑者5000(F5000)专题 • 上一篇    下一篇

2012-2014年F5000农业科学类论文资助基金研究

窦春蕊1),马秋明1),温晓平1)(),高继平2)   

  1. 1) 西北农林科技大学《西北农林科技大学学报(自然科学版)》编辑部,陕西杨凌西北农林科技大学北校区40号信箱 712100
    2) 中国科学技术信息研究所,北京市海淀区复兴路15号 100038
  • 收稿日期:2016-05-31 修回日期:2016-06-23 出版日期:2016-08-15 发布日期:2016-08-15
  • 通讯作者: 温晓平 E-mail:wenxp2518@163.com
  • 作者简介:窦春蕊(ORCID:0000-0001-8785-7098),硕士,副编审,E-mail: dchr1358@163.com|马秋明,硕士,编辑|高继平,博士,助理研究员
  • 基金资助:
    2015年度陕西省出版科学基金重点项目“入选领跑者5000(F5000)农业科学类论文学科分布及其来源研究”(14BSC06)

Foundations of F5000 papers in agricultural science during 2012-2014

DOU Chunrui1),MA Qiuming1),WEN Xiaoping1)(),GAO Jiping2)   

  1. 1) Editorial Department of Journal of Northwest A&F University(Natural Science Edition), Northwest A&F University, Yangling 712100,China;
    2) The Institute of Scientific and Technical Information of China, 15 Fuxing Road, Beijing 100038, China
  • Received:2016-05-31 Revised:2016-06-23 Online:2016-08-15 Published:2016-08-15
  • Contact: WEN Xiaoping E-mail:wenxp2518@163.com

摘要:

【目的】分析2012—2014年F5000农业科学类论文的基金资助情况,为农业期刊编辑的组稿、约稿提供参考。【方法】筛选并完善2012—2014年入选F5000的829篇农业科学类论文的被引频次、基金项目名称等信息,利用Excel对论文与基金级别、基金数量的关系进行分析。【结果】829篇论文的基金论文比为97.10%,其中有61.88%和62.85%的论文分别得到国家级、省部级基金资助,有78.05%的论文获得1~3项基金资助,论文篇均被引频次随获助基金数量增加而降低;中外合作项目和无基金资助的论文入选数量较少,但这两类论文的篇均被引频次却高达67.00和70.13。【结论】编辑在组稿、约稿时应关注获得国家级、省部级和中外合作项目资助的研究课题,并且应摒弃基金数量越多论文质量越优的偏见。

关键词: F5000, 农业科学, 基金项目, 被引频次, 组稿与约稿

Abstract:

[Purposes] This paper aims at studying the funding information of F5000 papers in agricultural science during 2012-2014 to provide a basis for editors soliciting contributions.[Methods] A total of 829 F5000 papers in agricultural science during 2012-2014 were selected and the number of citations per paper, the names of funding agencies, and other information were summarized.The projects were divided into four levels, including national, provincial or m inisterial, below provincial or m inisterial, and Sino-foreign cooperative projects.Then, the relationships between these papers and the number of projects at different levelswere analyzed.[Findings]The foundation-sponsored papers accounted for 97.10%of 829 papers.Papers funded by national and provincial orm inisterial projects accounted for61.88%and 62.85%.About78.05%of 829 paperswere funded by 1-3 foundations.Citation of each paper decreased w ith the increase of foundation numbers.The number of papers Received no foundation support or Sino-foreign cooperative support were less, but their average citations were as high as 70.13 and 67.00,respectively.[Conclusions] During soliciting contributions and initial review ing, editors should pay attention to papers funded by national, provincial or ministerial and Sino-foreign cooperative projects.Meanwhile, editors should abandon the prejudice that papers w ith more foundation supports have higher quality.

Key words: F5000, Agricultural science, Funding project, Citation, Soliciting contribution