摘要：
【目的】根据论文被引频次百分位创建不同学科论文被引频次基准线,探讨基于被引频次基准线遴选论文代表作的方法。【方法】以河南省科学技术领域学者为研究对象,以WoS数据库的学科分类为依据,建立不同学科论文被引频次基准线。依据该基准线对河南省各学科学者2009—2018年发表的每篇研究论文确定PR8分值,PR8分值≥3为论文代表作遴选的最低标准,其中PR8分值≥6者为第Ⅰ层次代表作,PR8分值≥5者为第Ⅱ层次代表作,PR8分值≥3者为第Ⅲ层次代表作。对不同层次代表作遴选的优秀学者进行比较。【结果】创建了177个学科论文被引频次基准线,根据代表作遴选标准确定了河南省学者7707篇代表作。采用代表作论文和全部论文以及采用不同层次代表作论文遴选优秀学者的结果明显不同。【结论】论文被引频次基准线在跨学科学术评价中具有重要意义,可以简单、明确地界定不同学科论文代表作;代表作评价制度的推行势在必行。
关键词:
被引频次基准线,
论文代表作,
PR8分值,
跨学科评价,
学者评价
Abstract:
[Purposes] This paper aims to create the baselines of citations for different subjects based on the citation percentile of the articles, and explore the methods for selecting representative works based on the baselines of citations. [Methods] Taking science and technology scholars in Henan Province as the research objects and the subject classification of Web of Science database as the basis, the baselines for the citations of articles in different subjects were established. Based on these baselines, a PR8 score was determined for each academic article published by scholars of various disciplines in Henan Province from 2009 to 2018; the threshold of representative works was that PR8 score was no less than 3. Among them, the paper with PR8 score ≥6 was the representative work of level I, the paper with PR8 score ≥5 was the representative work of level II, and the paper with PR8 score ≥3 was the representative work of level III. The excellent scholars selected by representative works with different levels were compared. [Findings] The baselines of citations for 177 disciplines are created. According to the selection criteria of representative works, 7707 representative works of the scholars in Henan Province are determined. The results of selecting outstanding scholars via representative articles and all articles and using different levels of representative articles are obviously different. [Conclusions] The baselines of citations have great significance in interdisciplinary academic evaluation. It can simply and clearly define the representative work in different disciplines, and it is imperative to practice the representative work-based evaluation system.
Key words:
Baselines of citation,
Representative work,
PR8 score,
Interdisciplinary evaluation,
Scholar evaluation
刘雪立, 申蓝, 郭佳, 魏雅慧, 盛丽娜, 郑成铭, 王燕, 周二强. 利用论文被引频次基准线遴选学者代表作的方法——以河南省学者论文为例[J]. 中国科技期刊研究, 2020, 31(8): 941-947.
LIU Xueli, SHEN Lan, GUO Jia, WEI Yahui, SHENG Lina, ZHENG Chengming, WANG Yan, ZHOU Erqiang. Method for selecting scholars' representative works by baselines of citations: Based on the articles of Henan Provincial scholars[J]. Chinese Journal of Scientific and Technical Periodicals, 2020, 31(8): 941-947.