摘要：

目的 响应培育世界一流科技期刊与中国特色新型智库建设的战略号召，探究同一法人主体下智库期刊与主办单位智库从形式同体走向实质协同的路径与机制，为同类机构推进期刊-智库协同发展提供理论依据与实践参考。 方法 从战略协同、内容协同、传播协同、组织协同、评价协同5个维度出发，搭建分析框架。通过多案例比较，归纳出具有代表性的协同路径，并识别其中起关键作用的协同措施。 结果 4组案例可以归纳为3种协同路径：顶层驱动型、组织融合型与平台协作型。在此基础上，进一步提炼出13项核心子机制。 结论 智库期刊与主办单位智库之间的协同，是一项涵盖战略制定到绩效评价的系统工程。上述3种路径分别对应了主办单位不同的资源禀赋、发展阶段以及体制层级，为期刊与智库从形式上的同一主体走向实质上的共生发展提供了可借鉴的先行经验。

关键词: 智库期刊, 智库, 协同路径, 多案例研究, 期刊转型, 协同机制

Abstract:

Purposes In response to the strategic call to cultivate world-class scientific journals and build new-type think tanks with Chinese characteristics， this study explores the pathways and mechanisms for think tank journals and their sponsoring think tanks under the same legal entity to transition from formal coexistence to substantive collaboration， thereby providing a theoretical basis and practical reference for similar institutions to promote the coordinated development of journals and think tanks. Methods This study builds a typological analytical framework based on five dimensions： strategic collaboration， content collaboration， communication collaboration， organizational collaboration， and evaluation collaboration. Using multiple-case comparison， it identifies representative collaborative pathways and pinpoints the core synergy mechanisms operating within them. Findings Analysis of the four case groups reveals three distinct patterns of collaborative pathways： top-down driven， organizational integration， and platform collaboration. Drawing from these patterns， 13 core sub-mechanisms are further extracted. Conclusions The synergy between think tank journals and their sponsoring think tanks represents a systematic effort that runs from strategy formulation all the way through performance evaluation. These three pathways correspond to varying resource endowments， development stages， and institutional hierarchies among sponsoring institutions. As such， they offer practical early examples for moving journals and think tanks beyond formal coexistence under the same legal entity and toward genuinely symbiotic development.

Key words: Think tank journals, Think tanks, Collaborative pathways, Multicase study, Journal transformation, Collaborative mechanisms