摘要：

目的 调研2024年Scopus收录的非英语科技期刊的发展概况，为非英语科技期刊的发展及构建多元化全球出版生态格局提供参考。方法 采用分类统计的分析方法，对Scopus数据库收录的非英语科技期刊的整体情况、语种分布、学科领域分布、出版模式、期刊论文承载力、学术影响力及可持续发展能力进行分析。结果 在2024年Scopus数据库收录非英语期刊中，中文、西班牙语和俄语期刊数量位列前3；不同语种期刊在细分学科覆盖广度上存在显著差异，其中中文期刊细分学科覆盖率达100%；葡萄牙语、波兰语期刊OA占比较高，德语、日语、中文期刊OA占比相对较低；在出版机构方面，非英语期刊整体规模化程度偏低；中文、西班牙语等出版期刊数Top3的机构以本土出版商为主，英语、德语等期刊由国际大型出版商主导；中文期刊的学术影响力在非英语期刊中表现相对突出；非英语期刊同样注重发挥其社会责任，密切关注联合国可持续发展目标。结论 非英语期刊，尤其是中文科技期刊，对构建多元化全球出版生态格局具有重要的支撑作用；非英语国家应推动国际数据库扩大非英语期刊的收录规模，协同共建世界科技论文引文库；并大力支持本国出版商发展壮大，形成多元化出版格局；不断提升本国期刊的论文承载力及学术影响力；加快推动开放科学进程，提升非英语科技期刊的全球影响力。

关键词: 非英语科技期刊, 影响力, 世界科技论文引文库, 中文期刊, 出版生态

Abstract:

Purposes This study investigates the development landscape of non-English scientific journals indexed in Scopus in 2024， aiming to provide references for advancing non-English scientific journals and constructing a diversified global publishing ecosystem. Methods Adopting a classification and statistical analysis approach， this paper systematically analyzes the overall profile， language distribution， subject field distribution， publishing models， paper carrying capacity， academic influence， and sustainable development capacity of non-English scientific journals included in the Scopus database. Findings Among non-English journals indexed in Scopus in 2024， Chinese， Spanish， and Russian journals rank the top three in terms of quantity. Significant differences exist in the breadth of sub-discipline coverage across journals in different languages， with Chinese journals achieving 100% sub-discipline coverage. Portuguese and Polish journals have relatively high open access （OA） rates， while German， Japanese， and Chinese journals have comparatively lower OA rates. In terms of publishing institutions， non-English journals generally exhibit a low degree of scale development. The top 3 institutions publishing the most journals in Chinese， Spanish， and other languages are predominantly local publishers， whereas English and German journals are dominated by large international publishing groups. The academic influence of Chinese journals stands out relatively among non-English journals. Non-English journals also attach great importance to fulfilling their social responsibilities and closely follow the United Nations Sustainable Development Goals （SDGs）. Conclusions Non-English journals， particularly Chinese scientific journals， play a crucial supporting role in building a diversified global publishing ecosystem. Non-English countries should urge international databases to expand the inclusion of non-English journals and collaboratively construct a global scientific paper citation database. They should also vigorously support the growth of domestic publishers to form a diversified publishing landscape， continuously enhance the paper carrying capacity and academic influence of national journals， and accelerate the open science process to elevate the global visibility and influence of non-English scientific journals.

Key words: Non-English scientific journals, Impact, World Science Paper Citation Database, Chinese journals, Publishing ecosystem