中国科技期刊研究 ›› 2026, Vol. 37 ›› Issue (2): 228-237. doi: 10.11946/cjstp.202512291647

论坛 上一篇    下一篇

AI辅助工具的应用与科技期刊编辑职业压力的关联——基于问卷调查的实证分析

李沛寰()()   

  1. 《郑州大学学报(医学版)》编辑部,河南省郑州市高新区科学大道100号 450001
  • 收稿日期:2025-12-29 修回日期:2026-02-22 出版日期:2026-02-25 发布日期:2026-04-01
  • 作者简介:

    李沛寰(ORCID:0009-0000-3052-5279),博士,编辑,E-mail:

  • 基金资助:
    中国高校科技期刊研究会地方期刊专业委员会2025年开放研究基金项目(CUJS-DF-2025-058)

Correlation between the application of AI-assisted tools and the occupational stress of scientific journal editors:an empirical analysis based on questionnaire survey

LI Peihuan()()   

  1. Editorial Department of Journal of Zhengzhou University (Medical Sciences),100 Science Avenue,Gaoxin District,Zhengzhou ;450001,China
  • Received:2025-12-29 Revised:2026-02-22 Online:2026-02-25 Published:2026-04-01

摘要:

目的 探究人工智能(AI)辅助工具的应用与科技期刊编辑职业压力的内在关联性,为缓解编辑职业压力并提高编辑AI素养提供数据支持和可行性的应对方案。 方法 以直接承担收稿、初审、编辑加工、校对、选题策划、作者沟通等编辑业务的河南省科技期刊一线编辑为调查对象,采用问卷调查编辑所面临的职业压力及其对工作中AI应用的认知水平等,并进行统计学分析。 结果 科技期刊编辑的工作负荷压力和技能更新压力最为突出,其AI素养整体处于中等水平,对AI应用的技术认知较清晰,但对伦理认知较模糊。AI素养与技能更新压力呈强正相关,与工作负荷压力呈强负相关(ρ=0.781、-0.744)。学历对编辑的AI素养有正向影响,工作负荷压力和AI应用的伦理认知对其有负向影响(β=0.130、-0.343、-0.396);编辑AI素养和技术认知对工作负荷压力有负向影响(β=-0.481、-0.341);AI应用的伦理认知对技能更新压力有负向影响,AI应用的技术认知对其有正向影响(β=-0.368、0.364)。聚类分析得到3类编辑群体画像:资深传统型、年轻高知型、基础实操型。 结论 AI 辅助工具的应用与科技期刊编辑职业压力存在双向关联,高AI素养可缓解工作负荷但加剧技能更新焦虑,AI应用的伦理认知模糊制约AI素养提升与压力缓解;建议通过构建分层分类的AI素养提升与职业压力缓解综合应对体系缓解科技期刊编辑的职业压力。

关键词: 人工智能, 科技期刊, 编辑, 职业压力, 聚类分析, 综合应对体系

Abstract:

Purposes To explore the intrinsic correlation between the application of AI-assisted tools and the occupational stress of scientific journal editors,and to provide data support and feasible countermeasures for alleviating editors’occupational stress and improving their AI literacy. Methods A questionnaire survey was conducted among frontline editors of scientific and technical journals in Henan Province who were directly engaged in editorial tasks such as manuscript reception, initial review, editorial processing, proofreading,topic planning,and author communication.Statistical analyses were performed to examine the occupational pressure faced by these editors and their cognitive levels regarding AI applications in their work. Findings Among the editors of scientific journals,work load pressure and skill renewal pressure were found to be the most prominent.Their overall AI literacy was at a medium level, with clear technical cognition of AI applications but vague ethical cognition.AI literacy was strongly positively correlated with skill renewal pressure(ρ=0.781) and strongly negatively correlated with work load pressure(ρ=-0.744). Educational background had a positive effect on editors’ AI literacy, while work load pressure and ethical cognition of AI applications had negative effects (β=0.130,-0.343,-0.396).Editors’ AI literacy and technical cognition of AI applications had negative effects on work load pressure(β=-0.481,-0.341).Ethical cognition of AI applications had a negative effect on skill renewal pressure,while technical cognition of AI applications had a positive effect(β=-0.368,0.364).Three clusters of editor profiles were identified via cluster analysis:senior traditional type,young high-knowledge type,and basic operation type. Conclusions A bidirectional correlation is identified between the application of AI-assisted tools and the occupational stress of scientific journal editors.High AI literacy alleviates workload but intensifies anxiety over skill renewal,while vague ethical cognition of AI application restricts the improvement of AI literacy and the relief of occupational stress.Comprehensive measures for classified and stratified AI literacy promotion and occupational stress alleviation are proposed to reduce the occupational stress of scientific journal editors.

Key words: Artificial intelligence, Scientific journals, Editors, Occupational stress, Cluster analysis, Comprehensive response systems