摘要：

【目的】 分析科学研究方法可重复性提升路径，为我国科学研究方法的开放共享与可重复性建设提供借鉴。【方法】 主要采用文献调研法、案例分析法、对比分析法和专家咨询法等开展可重复性提升路径案例研究。【结果】 可以从研究方法共享的内容、结构化标准化特征、审查程序、检测评估、研究资源认证及其可参与度和可扩展性等方面提升研究方法的可重复性。【结论】 建议我国科技期刊开设研究方法专栏专刊，或创办方法类期刊，共享研究方法的所有细节，推进研究方法共享内容的结构化和标准化。建议科技期刊加强与第三方平台的合作，对研究方法进行标准程序审查，加强元数据的自动化检测评估，并进行研究资源认证，同时增强研究方法的可参与度和可扩展性，以促进研究方法的共享与协作，提升科学研究方法的可重复性。此外，建议积极筹备我国可重复性研究机构，启动相应科研项目，逐步完善相关政策和评价机制，让更多的期刊和知识平台积极参与可重复性建设的发展。

关键词: 研究方法, 可重复性, 开放共享, 检测评估, 开放科学

Abstract:

[Purposes] This study aims to analyze the paths of improving the reproducibility of scientific research methods and provide a reference for the construction of open sharing and reproducibility improvement of scientific research methods in China. [Methods] We mainly used literature research, case analysis, comparative analysis, and expert consultation to conduct case studies on the paths of improving reproducibility. [Findings] The reproducibility of research methods can be improved in terms of shared content, structured and normalized features, review procedures, detection and evaluation, research resource certification, participation, extendibility, etc. [Conclusions] It is recommended that Chinese scientific journals establish column special issues on research methods or establish methodological journals to share all the details of research methods and promote the structuring and normalization of shared content of research methods. It is recommended that scientific journals should strengthen their cooperation with third-party platforms, conduct standard procedural reviews of research methods, enhance automatic detection and evaluation of metadata, and conduct research resource certification. At the same time, scientific journals should also enhance the participation and extendibility of research methods to promote the sharing and collaboration of research methods and improve the reproducibility of scientific research methods. In addition, it is suggested that China should actively prepare reproducibility research institutions, initiate corresponding scientific research projects, gradually improve relevant policies and evaluation mechanisms, and encourage more journals and knowledge platforms to actively participate in the development of reproducibility construction.

Key words: Research method, Reproducibility, Open sharing, Detection and evaluation, Open science