[1] |
Goodman S N, Fanelli D, Ioannidis J P A. What does research reproducibility mean?[J]. Science Translational Medicine, 2016, 8(341):341ps12.
|
[2] |
Hughes B T, Niemann A, Tritz D, et al. Transparent and reproducible research practices in the surgical literature[J]. Journal of Surgical Research, 2022, 274:116-124.
doi: 10.1016/j.jss.2021.09.024
pmid: 35150944
|
[3] |
Downing S M. Reliability:On the reproducibility of assessment data[J]. Medical Education, 2004, 38(9):1006-1012.
doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2929.2004.01932.x
pmid: 15327684
|
[4] |
Chalmers I, Glasziou P. Avoidable waste in the production and reporting of research evidence[J]. The Lancet, 2009, 374(9683):86-89.
|
[5] |
Nosek B A, Ebersole C R, DeHaven A C, et al. The preregistration revolution[J]. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 2018, 115(11):2600-2606.
doi: 10.1073/pnas.1708274114
pmid: 29531091
|
[6] |
Kerr N L. HARKing:Hypothesizing after the results are known[J]. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 1998, 2(3):196-217.
doi: 10.1207/s15327957pspr0203_4
pmid: 15647155
|
[7] |
Baker M. 1,500 scientists lift the lid on reproducibility[J]. Nature, 2016, 533(7604):452-454.
|
[8] |
Leichtmann B, Nitsch V, Mara M. Crisis ahead? Why human-robot interaction user studies may have replicability problems and directions for improvement[J]. Frontiers in Robotics and AI, 2022, 9:838116.
|
[9] |
Biagioli M. Before and after photoshop:Recursive fraud in the age of digital reproducibility[J]. Angewandte Chemie International Edition, 2019, 58(46):16334-16335.
|
[10] |
Romero F. The division of replication labor[J]. Philosophy of Science, 2020, 87(5):1014-1025.
|
[11] |
Bergman R G, Danheiser R L. Reproducibility in chemical research[J]. Angewandte Chemie International Edition, 2016, 55(41):12548-12549.
|
[12] |
Hensel W M. Double trouble? The communication dimension of the reproducibility crisis in experimental psychology and neuroscience[J]. European Journal for Philosophy of Science, 2020, 10(3):44.
|
[13] |
朱晶. 认知劳动分工视角下的科学合作与集体知识[J]. 哲学动态, 2020(3):111-118.
|
[14] |
Open Science Collaboration. Estimating the reproducibility of psychological science[J]. Science, 2015, 349(6251):eaac4716.
|
[15] |
Hagger M S, Chatzisarantis N L D, Alberts H, et al. A multilab preregistered replication of the ego-depletion effect[J]. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 2016, 11(4):546-573.
doi: 10.1177/1745691616652873
pmid: 27474142
|
[16] |
Jäger L A, Mertzen D, van Dyke J A, et al. Interference patterns in subject-verb agreement and reflexives revisited:A large-sample study[J]. Journal of Memory and Language, 2020, 111:104063.
|
[17] |
Klein R A, Vianello M, Hasselman F, et al. Many labs 2:Investigating variation in replicability across samples and settings[J]. Advances in Methods and Practices in Psychological Science, 2018, 1:443-490.
|
[18] |
Nieuwland M S, Politzer-Ahles S, Heyselaar E, et al. Large-scale replication study reveals a limit on probabilistic prediction in language comprehension[J]. eLife, 2018, 7:33468.
|
[19] |
Vasishth S, Mertzen D, Jäger L A, et al. The statistical significance filter leads to overoptimistic expectations of replicability[J]. Journal of Memory and Language, 2018, 103:151-175.
|
[20] |
Stack C M H, James A N, Watson D G. A failure to replicate rapid syntactic adaptation in comprehension[J]. Memory & Cognition, 2018, 46(6):864-877.
|
[21] |
Laurinavichyute A, Yadav H, Vasishth S. Share the code,not just the data:A case study of the reproducibility of articles published in the Journal of Memory and Language under the open data policy[J]. Journal of Memory and Language, 2022, 125:104332.
|
[22] |
孔祥辉. 欧美研究型大学图书馆可重复性专题服务调查研究[J]. 图书馆工作与研究, 2022(11):37-45.
|
[23] |
朱晶. 科学实践与合作网络中的可重复性问题[J]. 自然辩证法研究, 2022, 38(11):30-36.
|
[24] |
Methods:About the journal[EB/OL]. [ 2023-05-27]. https://www.sciencedirect.com/journal/methods.
URL
|
[25] |
Nature Methods:About the journal[EB/OL]. [ 2023-05-27]. https://www.nature.com/nmeth/aims.
URL
|
[26] |
Methods X:About the journal[EB/OL]. [ 2023-05-27]. https://www.sciencedirect.com/journal/methodsx.
URL
|
[27] |
Bring structure to your research:A secure platform for developing and sharing reproducible methods[EB/OL]. [ 2023-05-27]. https://www.protocols.io/features.
URL
|
[28] |
SciScoreTM is the best methods review tool for scientific articles[EB/OL]. [ 2023-11-27]. https://sciscore.com/.
URL
|
[29] |
Cost-benefit analysis for FAIR research data-Cost of not having FAIR research data[EB/OL]. [ 2023-05-27]. https://data.europa.eu/doi/10.2777/02999.
URL
|
[30] |
Buckheit J B, Donoho D L. WaveLab and reproducible research[M]// Antoniadis A, Oppenheim G. Wavelets and Statistics. New York: Springer, 1995:55-81.
|
[31] |
Nüst D, Eglen S J. Codecheck:An open science initiative for the independent execution of computations underlying research articles during peer review to improve reproducibility[J]. F1000Research, 2021, 10:253.
|
[32] |
Springer Nature continues open research drive with acquisition of protocols.io[EB/OL]. [ 2023-05-27]. https://group.springernature.com/gp/group/media/press-releases/publisher-acquires-protocolsio-driving-open-research/25844774.
URL
|
[33] |
MDAR-report[EB/OL]. [ 2023-05-27]. https://sciscore.com/reports/MDAR-Report.php.
URL
|
[34] |
STAR-report[EB/OL]. [ 2023-05-27]. https://sciscore.com/reports/STAR-Report.php.
URL
|
[35] |
STAR-methods[EB/OL]. [ 2023-05-27]. https://www.cell.com/star-methods.
URL
|
[36] |
About RRID[EB/OL]. [ 2023-05-27]. https://dknet.org/about/rrid.
URL
|
[37] |
SciScore report[EB/OL]. [ 2023-05-27]. https://www.scicrunch.com/sciscorereport-faq.
URL
|
[38] |
陈序文, 姚长青, 雷雪. 学术出版视角下科研成果可重复性保障机制研究[J]. 中国科技期刊研究, 2023, 34(11):1451-1457.
doi: 10.11946/cjstp.202307310568
|
[39] |
孟美任, 彭希珺. 论文数据可重复性问题剖析及一种解决方案[J]. 中国科技期刊研究, 2021, 32(3):397-402.
doi: 10.11946/cjstp.201910010677
|