中国科技期刊研究 ›› 2024, Vol. 35 ›› Issue (5): 568-576. doi: 10.11946/cjstp.202404020314

• 第二届科技期刊学术论坛专题 • 上一篇    下一篇

科技期刊与预印本平台协同发展路径与策略研究

刘敬仪1)()(), 杨恒1,2), 初景利1,2),*()()   

  1. 1) 中国科学院文献情报中心,北京市海淀区中关村北四环西路33号 100190
    2) 中国科学院大学经济与管理学院信息资源管理系,北京市海淀区中关村北四环西路33号 100190
  • 收稿日期:2024-04-02 修回日期:2024-04-11 出版日期:2024-05-15 发布日期:2024-06-11
  • 通讯作者: 初景利(ORCID:0000-0003-0723-3985),博士,教授,博士生导师,E-mail:chujl@mail.las.ac.cn
  • 作者简介:
    刘敬仪(ORCID:0000-0002-3462-6429),博士,博士后,E-mail:
    杨恒,博士研究生。
    作者贡献声明: 刘敬仪:设计论文框架,撰写、修改论文; 杨 恒:撰写、修改论文; 初景利:提出选题,指导论文撰写,修改论文。
  • 基金资助:
    中国博士后科学基金资助项目“学术期刊出版与预印本平台的协同作用机制研究”(2023M733707); 中国科学院特别研究助理资助项目“预印本平台发展战略与政策需求”(E3290806)

Collaborative development path and strategy of scientific journal and preprint platform

LIU Jingyi1)()(), YANG Heng1,2), CHU Jingli1,2)()()   

  1. 1) National Science Library, Chinese Academy of Sciences, 33 Beisihuan Xilu, Zhongguancun, Haidian District, Beijing 100190, China
    2) Department of Information Resources Management, School of Economics and Management, University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, 33 Beisihuan Xilu, Zhongguancun, Haidian District, Beijing 100190, China
  • Received:2024-04-02 Revised:2024-04-11 Online:2024-05-15 Published:2024-06-11

摘要:

【目的】探究科技期刊与预印本平台的协同发展路径,提出科技期刊与预印本平台的协同发展策略,为构建开放科学时代新型学术交流模式提供参考与借鉴。【方法】选取国际上具有代表性的科技期刊与预印本平台合作案例,采用描述型案例研究法,总结、梳理现有典型合作模式的特征,提炼科技期刊与预印本平台的协同发展路径。【结果】研究发现,现阶段科技期刊与预印本平台存在3条协同路径,分别为平台发展驱动的资源协同、用户需求驱动的流程协同、开放科学驱动的目标协同。【结论】建议科技期刊及各预印本利益相关者充分认识协同发展益处、不断强化协同发展意识、尽快制定协同发展政策、共同构建协同发展生态。

关键词: 科技期刊, 预印本平台, 预印本, 开放科学, 协同

Abstract:

[Purposes] This study aims to explore the collaborative development path between scientific journals and preprint platforms, and to propose the collaborative development strategy of scientific journals and preprint platforms, so as to provide a reference for constructing a new academic exchange model in the era of open science. [Methods] We selected representative international cases of collaboration between scientific journals and preprint platforms. With a descriptive case study approach, we summarized and sorted out the characteristics of existing typical cooperative models and extracted the collaborative development path between scientific journals and preprint platforms. [Findings] The paper identifies three collaborative paths for scientific journals and preprint platforms: resource collaboration driven by platform development, process collaboration driven by user demand, and goal collaboration driven by open science. [Conclusions] It is recommended that scientific journals and preprint stakeholders fully recognize the benefits of collaborative development, continuously enhance their awareness of collaborative development, promptly formulate policies to support collaborative development, and jointly foster an ecosystem conducive to collaborative development.

Key words: Scientific journal, Preprint platform, Preprint, Open science, Collaboration