中国科技期刊研究 ›› 2024, Vol. 35 ›› Issue (5): 593-599. doi: 10.11946/cjstp.202403190248

• 第二届科技期刊学术论坛专题 • 上一篇    下一篇

高水平科学家担任科技期刊编委的现状调研与分析

李苑1)()(), 刘荣2), 刘凤红1,3), 沈哲思1), 彭希珺1), 杜杏叶1,3), 董文杰1), 梁永霞1), 初景利1,3),*()()   

  1. 1) 中国科学院文献情报中心,北京市海淀区中关村北四环西路33号 100190
    2) 中国科协学会服务中心,北京市海淀区学院南路86号 100081
    3) 中国科学院大学经济与管理学院信息资源管理系,北京市海淀区中关村北四环西路33号 100190
  • 收稿日期:2024-03-19 修回日期:2024-03-26 出版日期:2024-05-15 发布日期:2024-06-11
  • 通讯作者: 初景利(ORCID:0000-0003-0723-3985),博士,教授,博士生导师,中国科学院文献情报中心《图书情报工作》杂志社社长、主编,中国科学院大学经济与管理学院信息资源管理系主任,E-mail:chujl@mail.las.ac.cn
  • 作者简介:
    李苑(ORCID:0000-0002-1656-3727),硕士,副研究馆员,E-mail:
    刘荣,硕士,编审
    刘凤红,博士,研究馆员
    沈哲思,博士,副研究馆员
    彭希珺,硕士,副研究馆员
    杜杏叶,博士,研究馆员
    董文杰,博士,副研究馆员
    梁永霞,博士,副研究馆员、编审。
    作者贡献声明: 李 苑:提出论文基本框架,设计研究方案和研究思路,调研和整理文献,分析数据,撰写论文; 刘 荣:提出论文基本框架,设计研究方案和目标,修订论文; 刘凤红:设计期刊遴选方案,遴选样本期刊,收集和统计数据,清洗和分析数据结果,撰写和修订论文; 沈哲思:收集数据,参与研究方案制定; 彭希珺:参与论文框架设计和结论撰写,修订论文; 杜杏叶:参与问卷设计与发放,修订论文; 董文杰:设计问卷,分析数据结果; 梁永霞:设计和发放问卷,参与结果分析; 初景利:制定论文基本框架,设计研究方案,指导论文修改。
  • 基金资助:
    中国科协学会服务中心项目“高水平科学家参与科技期刊治理的研究”(2022XFKJQK06)

Research and analysis of high-level scientists serving as editorial board members of scientific journals

LI Yuan1)()(), LIU Rong2), LIU Fenghong1,3), SHEN Zhesi1), PENG Xijun1), DU Xingye1,3), DONG Wenjie1), LIANG Yongxia1), CHU Jingli1,3)()()   

  1. 1) National Science Library, Chinese Academy of Sciences, 33 Beisihuan Xilu, Zhongguancun, Haidian District, Beijing 100190, China
    2) Service Center for Societies of China Association for Science and Technology, 86 South Xueyuan Road, Haidian District, Beijing 100081, China
    3) Department of Information Resources Management, School of Economics and Management, University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, 33 Beisihuan Xilu, Zhongguancun, Haidian District, Beijing 100190, China
  • Received:2024-03-19 Revised:2024-03-26 Online:2024-05-15 Published:2024-06-11

摘要:

【目的】调研高水平科学家担任科技期刊编委的情况,梳理科技期刊的编委会并从科学家角度分析其发挥的重要作用,客观呈现科学家参与科技期刊建设的现状。【方法】通过网络调研高水平科学家数据,梳理我国代表性科技期刊的编委会组成和规模,通过问卷调研和访谈了解科学家参与科技期刊建设的现状。【结果】担任科技期刊编委的高水平科学家数量和比例与期刊质量相关,编委会规模与期刊影响力相关,编委在期刊中发挥的作用与期刊编辑期待较为一致,但在个别方面存在差异。【结论】编委会中高水平科学家数量和比例与科技期刊质量存在相关性,科学家作为编委发挥的作用基本达到编辑的预期,但科学家作为科技期刊编委的贡献仍需要系统和多维度的评价。

关键词: 科技期刊, 高水平科学家, 编委会

Abstract:

[Purposes] This paper aims to investigate the involvement of high-level scientists in the editorial boards of scientific journals, organize the structure of these editorial boards, and analyze the significant role they play from the scientists' perspective. It objectively presents the current state of scientists' participation in the development of scientific journals. [Methods] We investigated the data of high-level scientists through online research, analyzed the composition and size of the editorial boards of the representative scientific journals in China, and explored the current situation of scientists' participation in the construction of scientific journals through questionnaires and interviews. [Findings] The number and proportion of high-level scientists serving as editorial board members of scientific journals are related to the quality of the journals, and the size of the editorial board is related to the influence of the journals. The roles played by editorial board members in journals are more consistent with the expectations of the journal's editors. However, there are discrepancies in certain aspects. [Conclusions] The number and proportion of high-level scientists in editorial boards are related to the quality of scientific journals. While the role played by scientists as editorial board members basically meets the expectations of editors, the contribution of scientists serving on editorial boards of scientific journals still requires systematic and multidimensional evaluation.

Key words: Scientific journal, High-level scientist, Editorial board