中国科技期刊研究 ›› 2024, Vol. 35 ›› Issue (5): 617-622. doi: 10.11946/cjstp.202404150371

• 第二届科技期刊学术论坛专题 • 上一篇    下一篇

英文科技期刊基于“学术+出版”办刊模式的探索——以《纳米材料科学(英文)》的办刊实践为例

王维朗1)()(), 袁文全1), 游滨2), 薛婧媛1), 颜永松1)   

  1. 1) 重庆大学期刊社,重庆市沙坪坝区沙正街174号 400044
    2) 重庆大学出版社,重庆市沙坪坝区大学城西路21号 401331
  • 收稿日期:2024-04-15 修回日期:2024-04-20 出版日期:2024-05-15 发布日期:2024-06-11
  • 作者简介:

    王维朗(ORCID:0000-0002-6480-8266),硕士,编审,副社长,E-mail:

    袁文全,博士,教授,社长兼总编辑

    游滨,硕士,编审,总编辑

    薛婧媛,博士,副编审

    颜永松,硕士,副编审。

    作者贡献声明: 王维朗:整理论文素材,提出写作框架,撰写并修改论文; 袁文全,游 滨:指导论文写作; 薛婧媛:参与论文修订; 颜永松:参与论文资料整理。
  • 基金资助:
    教育部人文社会科学研究基金青年项目“媒介融合视域下学术出版人才队伍建设与培养研究”(18YJC860034); 重庆市社会科学规划英才计划项目“科技期刊人才队伍培养与一流期刊建设路径研究”(2022YC006)

Exploration of English scientific journals based on the "academic+publishing" mode: A case study of Nano Materials Science

WANG Weilang1)()(), YUAN Wenquan1), YOU Bin2), XUE Jingyuan1), YAN Yongsong1)   

  1. 1) Journals Department of Chongqing University, 174 Shazheng Street, Shapingba District, Chongqing 400044, China
    2) Chongqing University Press, 21 West Daxuecheng Road, Shapingba District, Chongqing 401331, China
  • Received:2024-04-15 Revised:2024-04-20 Online:2024-05-15 Published:2024-06-11

摘要:

【目的】研究英文科技期刊“学术+出版”办刊模式,探索科技期刊高质量发展的思路,为一流科技期刊建设提供参考。【方法】以《纳米材料科学(英文)》的发展实践为切入点,分析“学术+出版”办刊模式的主要内涵,讨论“学术”与“出版”的主要分工和职责。【结果】科技期刊“学术”方面重点在于以主编、编委为核心的学术团队,控制学术质量,确保科技期刊前端的内容质量;“出版”方面关键在于以期刊编辑为中心的出版团队,负责期刊的过程管理及后端的影响力提升。“学术”与“出版”相结合,确保科技期刊前端的内容质量、过程的规范标准及后端的影响提升。【结论】科技期刊“学术+出版”办刊模式,可实现“学术”与“出版”之间优势互补、互助共进,形成办刊合力,提升期刊发展的整体性和协同性,从而推动期刊高质量发展和一流科技期刊建设。

关键词: 一流科技期刊, 办刊模式, 学术+出版, 高质量发展

Abstract:

[Purposes] This paper aims to study the "academic+publishing" mode of English scientific journals, exploring pathways for developing high-quality journals, and providing references for the construction of first-class scientific journals. [Methods] Based on the development practice of Nano Materials Science, this paper analyzed the main connotation of the "academic+publishing" mode and discussed the main roles and responsibilities of "academics" and "publication", respectively. [Findings] The "academic" part of scientific journals relies on the academic team consisting of editor-in-chief and editorial board members, who guarantee the academic integrity of front-end content. The "publishing" part of scientific journals lies in the publishing team centered on the journal editors, who are responsible for the process management and backend impact enhancement. The combination of "academic" and "publishing" can ensure the quality of front-end content, standardization of processes, and amplification of backend impact for scientific journals. [Conclusions] The "academic+publishing" mode of scientific journals facilitates a synergistic interplay between "academic" and "publishing", fostering mutual reinforcement and collaborative advancement. This approach fortifies scientific journal development holistically, driving high-quality progression and the establishment of first-class scientific journals.

Key words: First-class scientific journal, Journal development mode, Academic+publishing, High-quality development