中国科技期刊研究 ›› 2023, Vol. 34 ›› Issue (11): 1451-1457. doi: 10.11946/cjstp.202307310568

• • 上一篇    下一篇

学术出版视角下科研成果可重复性保障机制研究

陈序文()(), 姚长青, 雷雪*()()   

  1. 中国科学技术信息研究所,北京市海淀区复兴路15号 100038
  • 收稿日期:2023-07-31 修回日期:2023-09-21 出版日期:2023-11-15 发布日期:2023-11-13
  • 通讯作者: 雷 雪(ORCID:0000-0001-7955-5137),博士,副研究馆员,E-mail:leix@istic.ac.cn
  • 作者简介:

    陈序文(ORCID:0009-0007-2109-0841),硕士研究生,E-mail:;

    姚长青,博士,研究员。

    作者贡献声明: 陈序文:收集资料,撰写论文; 姚长青:提出研究方向,审定论文终稿; 雷 雪:设计研究方案,修改论文。
  • 基金资助:
    中国科学技术信息研究所创新研究基金面上项目“文献资源管理视角下科研成果可靠性与可重复性保障机制研究”(MS2023-06)

Reproducibility safeguard mechanism of scientific research results from the perspective of academic publishing

CHEN Xuwen()(), YAO Changqing, LEI Xue*()()   

  1. Institute of Scientific and Technical Information of China, 15 Fuxing Road, Haidian District, Beijing 100038, China
  • Received:2023-07-31 Revised:2023-09-21 Online:2023-11-15 Published:2023-11-13

摘要:

【目的】 可重复性是科学研究的基本原则之一。从学术出版视角提出保障机制,以应对学术界日益严重的可重复性危机。【方法】 调研科技期刊出版商、学/协会以及国际组织的相关政策、指南与实践,从出版流程和出版导向两个维度梳理其针对研究数据、研究过程、研究结果和研究类型的可重复性保障举措。【结果】 在出版流程维度,需要出台期刊数据政策、倡导结构化报告、推进开放评议以及创新检测技术,以保证研究数据和研究过程的透明度和可靠性;在出版导向维度,需要推进注册报告、再现性论文等新型论文出版,还要加强编辑的可重复性认知培训。【结论】 提高我国科研成果的可重复性,需要借鉴国际成熟经验加快论文关联数据汇交,关注业界前沿举措推进学术出版模式创新,以及完善科技评价体系促进科研观念转变。

关键词: 可重复性, 学术出版, 开放科学, 科研诚信

Abstract:

[Purposes] Reproducibility is one of the basic principles of scientific research. From the perspective of academic publishing, a safeguard mechanism is proposed to cope with the increasingly severe reproducibility crisis. [Methods] We investigated the relevant policies, guidelines, and practices of scientific journal publishers, academic associations, and international organizations and sorted out the repeatability guarantee measures for research data, research process, research results, and research types from two dimensions of publishing process and publishing orientation. [Findings] In the dimension of the publishing process, it is necessary to introduce journal data policies, advocate structured reports, promote open review, and innovate detection technologies to ensure the transparency and reliability of research data and research processes. In the dimension of publication orientation, it is necessary to promote the publication of new types of papers such as registration reports and reproducibility papers and strengthen the reproducibility awareness training of editors. [Conclusions] To improve the reproducibility of China's scientific research achievements, it is necessary to learn from international mature experience to accelerate the exchange of paper-related data, pay attention to cutting-edge measures in the industry to promote the innovation of academic publishing models, and improve the scientific and technological evaluation system to promote the transformation of scientific research concepts.

Key words: Reproducibility, Academic publishing, Open science, Scientific research integrity