[1] |
推动创新驱动发展战略加快建设科技强国[EB/OL]. (2017-11-06)[2022-05-19]. http://news.cnr.cn/native/gd/20171106/t20171106_524014452.shtml.
URL
|
[2] |
Garfield E. Citation analysis as a tool in journal evaluation[J]. Science, 1972, 178(4060):471-479.
pmid: 5079701
|
[3] |
王崇德. 期刊引文分析评价中的几个指标[J]. 情报学刊, 1985, 6(4):18-21.
|
[4] |
Fassin Y. Research on Covid-19:A disruptive phenomenon for bibliometrics[J]. Scientometrics, 2021, 126(6):5305-5319.
doi: 10.1007/s11192-021-03989-w
URL
|
[5] |
刘素贞, 魏建晶. 郭正堂院士专访:评价体系改革促进中国学术期刊发展[J]. 科学通报, 2020, 65(21):2187-2190.
|
[6] |
Christensen C M. The innovator's dilemma:When new technologies cause great firms to fail[M]. Harvard: Harvard Business Review Press, 2013.
|
[7] |
刘安蓉, 李莉, 曹晓阳, 等. 颠覆性技术概念的战略内涵及政策启示[J]. 中国工程科学, 2018, 20(6):7-13.
|
[8] |
苏鹏, 苏成, 潘云涛. 颠覆性技术识别方法发展现状及启示[J]. 图书情报工作, 2019, 63(20):129-138.
doi: 10.13266/j.issn.0252-3116.2019.20.015
|
[9] |
许海云, 刘亚辉, 罗瑞. 突破性科学创新早期识别研究综述[J]. 情报理论与实践, 2021, 44(4):198-205.
|
[10] |
张金柱, 王秋月, 仇蒙蒙. 颠覆性技术识别研究进展综述[J/OL]. 数据分析与知识发现, 2022:1-27[2022-06-25]. https://kns.cnki.net/kcms/detail/10.1478.g2.20220304.1437.002.html.
URL
|
[11] |
Kostoff R N, Boylan R, Simons G R. Disruptive technology roadmaps[J]. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 2004, 71(1/2):141-159.
doi: 10.1016/S0040-1625(03)00048-9
URL
|
[12] |
Jones B F, Weinberg B A. Age dynamics in scientific creativity[J]. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 2011, 108(47):18910-18914.
|
[13] |
Arts S, Appio F P, van Looy B. Inventions shaping technological trajectories:Do existing patent indicators provide a comprehensive picture?[J]. Scientometrics, 2013, 97(2):397-419.
doi: 10.1007/s11192-013-1045-1
URL
|
[14] |
Ponomarev I V, Lawton B K, Williams D E, et al. Breakthrough paper indicator 2.0:Can geographical diversity and interdisciplinarity improve the accuracy of outstanding papers prediction?[J]. Scientometrics, 2014, 100(3):755-765.
doi: 10.1007/s11192-014-1320-9
URL
|
[15] |
Schneider J W, Costas R. Identifying potential "breakthrough" publications using refined citation analyses:Three related explorative approaches[J]. Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology, 2017, 68(3):709-723.
doi: 10.1002/asi.23695
URL
|
[16] |
Mazloumian A, Eom Y H, Helbing D, et al. How citation boosts promote scientific paradigm shifts and Nobel prizes[J]. PLoS One, 2011, 6(5):e18975.
doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0018975
URL
|
[17] |
Du J, Tang X L, Wu Y S. The effects of research level and article type on the differences between citation metrics and F1000 recommendations[J]. Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology, 2016, 67(12):3008-3021.
doi: 10.1002/asi.23548
URL
|
[18] |
Huang Y H, Hsu C N, Lerman K. Identifying transformative scientific research[C]// 2013 IEEE 13th International Conference on Data Mining,December 7-10,2013,Dallas,TX,USA. New York: IEEE Press, 2013:291-300.
|
[19] |
Funk R J, Owen-Smith J. A dynamic network measure of technological change[J]. Management Science, 2016, 63(3):791-817.
doi: 10.1287/mnsc.2015.2366
URL
|
[20] |
Wu L F, Wang D S, Evans J A. Large teams develop and small teams disrupt science and technology[J]. Nature, 2019, 566(7744):378-382.
doi: 10.1038/s41586-019-0941-9
URL
|
[21] |
Bornmann L, Tekles A. Disruptive papers published in Scientometrics[J]. Scientometrics, 2019, 120(1):331-336.
doi: 10.1007/s11192-019-03113-z
|
[22] |
Horen S R, Hansdorfer M A, Kronshtal R, et al. The most disruptive publications in craniofacial surgery (1954-2014)[J]. The Journal of Craniofacial Surgery, 2021, 32(7):2426-2430.
doi: 10.1097/SCS.0000000000007804
URL
|
[23] |
Sullivan G A, Skertich N J, Gulack B C, et al. Shifting paradigms:The top 100 most disruptive papers in core pediatric surgery journals[J]. Journal of Pediatric Surgery, 2021, 56(8):1263-1274.
doi: 10.1016/j.jpedsurg.2021.02.002
pmid: 33678406
|
[24] |
Meyer C, Nakamura Y, Rasor B J, et al. Analysis of the innovation trend in cell-free synthetic biology[J]. Life (Basel), 2021, 11(6):551.
|
[25] |
Foster J G, Rzhetsky A, Evans J A. Tradition and innovation in scientists' research strategies[J]. American Sociological Review, 2015, 80(5):875-908.
doi: 10.1177/0003122415601618
URL
|
[26] |
陈育新, 李健, 韩毅. 核心—边缘理论视角下的颠覆性技术识别研究[J/OL]. 情报理论与实践, 2022:1-13. [2022-06-25]. https://kns.cnki.net/kcms/detail/11.1762.G3.20220615.1822.005.html.
URL
|
[27] |
Wu S, Wu Q. A confusing definition of disruption[Z/OL].(2019-04-18)[2022-06-25]. https://osf.io/preprints/socarxiv/d3wpk/.
URL
|
[28] |
Leydesdorff L, Tekles A, Bornmann L. A proposal to revise the disruption index[J]. El Profesional De La Información, 2021, 30(1):86387.
|
[29] |
刘小慧, 沈哲思, 廖宇, 等. 科研论文颠覆性指数的改进及其影响因素研究[J]. 图书情报工作, 2020, 64(24):84-91.
doi: 10.13266/j.issn.0252-3116.2020.24.010
|
[30] |
刘雪立, 申小曼, 郭佳, 等. 论文被引频次学科领域百分位在创建期刊百分位数指标中的应用[J]. 中国科技期刊研究, 2021, 32(1):118-124.
|
[31] |
Bornmann L, Mutz R. Further steps towards an ideal method of measuring citation performance:The avoidance of citation (ratio) averages in field-normalization[J]. Journal of Informetrics, 2011, 5(1):228-230.
doi: 10.1016/j.joi.2010.10.009
URL
|
[32] |
宋丽萍, 王建芳, 王树义. 科学评价视角下F1000、Mendeley与传统文献计量指标的比较[J]. 中国图书馆学报, 2014, 40(4):48-54.
|
[33] |
盖双双, 刘雪立, 周晶. 基于F1000的期刊评价指标构建及其实证研究:以眼科学期刊为例[J]. 科技与出版, 2015(11):123-128.
|
[34] |
Bornmann L, Tekles A. Disruption index depends on length of citation window[J]. El Profesional De La Información, 2019, 28(2):43224.
|
[35] |
刘小慧, 沈哲思, 廖宇, 等. 颠覆性指数的稳定时间窗研究[J]. 图书情报工作, 2021, 65(18):49-57.
doi: 10.13266/j.issn.0252-3116.2021.18.006
|
[36] |
Ruan X M, Lyu D Q, Gong K L, et al. Rethinking the disruption index as a measure of scientific and technological advances[J]. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 2021, 172:121071.
doi: 10.1016/j.techfore.2021.121071
URL
|
[37] |
Bornmann L, Devarakonda S, Tekles A, et al. Are disruption index indicators convergently valid? The comparison of several indicator variants with assessments by peers[J]. Quantitative Science Studies, 2020, 1(3):1242-1259.
doi: 10.1162/qss_a_00068
URL
|
[38] |
Leydesdorff L, Bornmann L. Disruption indices and their calculation using Web-of-Science data:Indicators of historical developments or evolutionary dynamics?[J]. Journal of Informetrics, 2021, 15(4):101219.
doi: 10.1016/j.joi.2021.101219
URL
|