摘要：

【目的】分析主流学术群体关注度与期刊学术地位的关系,验证群体关注度指标在监测期刊影响力变化方面的有效性,为期刊自我诊断、规划发展提供支持。【方法】基于学术授信评价理论,提出一种根据期刊所获学术授信情况衡量其影响力的方法,设计相关指标来考察主流学术群体关注度变化对期刊学术地位的影响,然后以2种图情边缘核心期刊为例进行实证检验。【结果】主流学术群体对特定期刊的关注度与期刊的学术地位正向相关,主流学术群体人均发文量、年度发文量、年度发文人数、人均施引量、年度施引量、年度施引人数等群体关注度指标可有效表征期刊的学术地位。【结论】学术授信评价理论可为期刊影响力监测与评价提供新的视角,识别主流学术群体并与其保持学术联系有助于稳固期刊的学术地位,监测主流学术群体的关注度变化可有效预测期刊影响力及学术地位的升降趋势。

关键词: 学术授信分析, 主流学术群体, 期刊学术影响力, 期刊评价

Abstract:

[Purposes] This paper analyzes the relationship between the attention of mainstream academic groups and the academic status of journals and verifies the effectiveness of the attention indicators in monitoring the change of journal impact, which is expected to enhance the self-diagnosis and development of journals. [Methods] Based on the theory of academic credit evaluation, this paper proposed a method to measure the influence of journals according to the academic credit, designed the relevant indicators to investigate the influence of changes in the attention of mainstream academic groups on the academic status of journals, and tested the method with two journals in library and information whose academic status was unstable. [Findings] The attention of mainstream academic groups to a particular journal is in positive correlation with the academic status of the journal, and the indicators of the attention, such as the number of per capita published articles, annual total number of published articles, annual total number of scholars who published articles, number of per capita citations, annual total number of citations, and annual total number of scholars who cited the target journals, can characterize the academic status of a journal. [Conclusions] The theory of academic credit evaluation provides a new perspective for monitoring and evaluating the influence of journals. Identifying mainstream academic groups and keeping in contact with them can help bolster the academic status of journals. Monitoring the changes of attention of mainstream academic groups can help predict the impact and academic status of journals.

Key words: Academic credit analysis, Mainstream academic group, Academic influence of journals, Journal evaluation